How much credit should the receivers get for yesterday's performance?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OpIv37
    Acid Douching Asswipe
    • Sep 2002
    • 101265

    How much credit should the receivers get for yesterday's performance?

    In the absence of Moulds, both Reed and Shaw came through when it counted. But there was one other key factor- a dominant running game. It forced the defense to crowd the line and allowed the receivers to get open in one-on-one coverage.

    Not to take away from the receivers but it begs the question- if we had been able to run the ball like that all season, would Reed Shaw, and Moulds have more impressive numbers?
    MiKiDo Facebook
    MiKiDo Website
  • helmetguy
    Touch the helmet for luck
    • Sep 2002
    • 5949

    #2
    Balnce, Balance, balance.

    Amazing what ya can do if ya can run the ball too, huh?
    Someone said "What's he gonna turn out like?" Ha!
    And someone else said "Never mind!"

    -Deep Purple

    "Have you ever taken a crap so big your pants fit better?"--Ron White

    Comment

    • Cntrygal
      Visually stunning but camera-shy.
      • Jul 2002
      • 44884

      #3
      The run sets up the pass..... can we record that and slip it into KG's house, office, car, and anywhere else he may spend more than 30 seconds?
      Originally posted by notacon
      The biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.

      For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com

      Comment

      • Jan Reimers
        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
        • May 2003
        • 17353

        #4
        Reed was finally the receiver we all thought he would be this year. I can't wait to get Moulds back - he and Josh will be some combination.
        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

        Comment

        • gochiefs
          Registered User
          • Nov 2002
          • 417

          #5
          Reed is REALLY slow...i don't know why the Bills thought he could be a starter.

          Comment

          • OpIv37
            Acid Douching Asswipe
            • Sep 2002
            • 101265

            #6
            Originally posted by gochiefs
            Reed is REALLY slow...i don't know why the Bills thought he could be a starter.
            Moulds is such a deep threat I guess they thought he'd be a good possession guy. Speed hasn't been his big problem this year- prior to the Redskins game, he was dropping more balls than he caught. It was definitely a factor in the losses to Philly and Miami.
            MiKiDo Facebook
            MiKiDo Website

            Comment

            • The Spaz
              Registered User
              • Mar 2003
              • 19066

              #7
              Originally posted by gochiefs
              Reed is REALLY slow...i don't know why the Bills thought he could be a starter.
              Yeah I know it is different in the NFL but there are fast players in college who sure couldn't stop Josh Reed from becoming the best college redeiver that year now could they?
              Last edited by The Spaz; 10-21-2003, 06:25 PM.

              Comment

              • gochiefs
                Registered User
                • Nov 2002
                • 417

                #8
                Uh, the college level is MUCH slower than the NFL level. That's why Reed isn't an all-pro at this level.

                Comment

                • The Spaz
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 19066

                  #9
                  Originally posted by gochiefs
                  Uh, the college level is MUCH slower than the NFL level. That's why Reed isn't an all-pro at this level.
                  Hey slick he's in the 2nd year in the NFL. :ko:

                  Comment

                  • gochiefs
                    Registered User
                    • Nov 2002
                    • 417

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Spaz


                    Hey slick he's in the 2nd year in the NFL. :ko:
                    Doesn't change the fact he's sloooooow.

                    Comment

                    • The Spaz
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 19066

                      #11
                      Originally posted by gochiefs


                      Doesn't change the fact he's sloooooow.
                      He can't be that slow he runs a 4.5 or 4.6. If he were that slow why was he able to get over 100 yards receiving against Champ Bailey?

                      Comment

                      • gochiefs
                        Registered User
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 417

                        #12
                        Because the Redskins suck, newsflash. And Bailey is an overrated "name," like Charles Woodson, another overrated CB.

                        Oh...4.5 and 4.6? SLOW FOR A WR! HELLOOOO?

                        Comment

                        • The Spaz
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 19066

                          #13
                          Originally posted by gochiefs
                          Because the Redskins suck, newsflash. And Bailey is an overrated "name," like Charles Woodson, another overrated CB.

                          Oh...4.5 and 4.6? SLOW FOR A WR! HELLOOOO?
                          Hey he's able to still get open amazing!

                          Comment

                          • Billzz
                            Registered User
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 1131

                            #14
                            There's a hell of difference between Running the Ball and RUNNING THE BALL EFFECTIVELY!!!!!!!!!

                            Comment

                            • gochiefs
                              Registered User
                              • Nov 2002
                              • 417

                              #15
                              He's still not a threat or a gamebreaker...no one is scared of him. When you guys let Price go you chopped the nuts off that offense...with Price you were scary....now, not so scary.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X