Are we pissed because players aren't performing?
Or are we pissed that our players are not executing poorly designed plays.
What I'm getting at is if it's poor execution, then the playcalling is just fine. Good execution makes the plays work-( I assume.)
Or is it piss poor playcalling? If the playcalling is bad, even executing the play correctly will result in failure.
Look at the Bledsoe "Screen" to no one. The WRs were expecting a screen, so they are blocking downfield. The O Line apparently figured it was a screen and they pulled out to block for it. Bledsoe looked to where the RB was supposed to be. Sammy Morris was supposed to be the receiver but he stayed in to provide protection. Bledsoe does the only prudent thing and jettison the ball.
Was it Bledsoe's fault? His WR's aren't even looking for a pass.
Morris? The Dumbass was supposed to be receiving a screen.
Or Gilbride? Calling a screen on 3rd and forever. It's a play doomed to failure even if it was carried out to perfection.
Or are we pissed that our players are not executing poorly designed plays.
What I'm getting at is if it's poor execution, then the playcalling is just fine. Good execution makes the plays work-( I assume.)
Or is it piss poor playcalling? If the playcalling is bad, even executing the play correctly will result in failure.
Look at the Bledsoe "Screen" to no one. The WRs were expecting a screen, so they are blocking downfield. The O Line apparently figured it was a screen and they pulled out to block for it. Bledsoe looked to where the RB was supposed to be. Sammy Morris was supposed to be the receiver but he stayed in to provide protection. Bledsoe does the only prudent thing and jettison the ball.
Was it Bledsoe's fault? His WR's aren't even looking for a pass.
Morris? The Dumbass was supposed to be receiving a screen.
Or Gilbride? Calling a screen on 3rd and forever. It's a play doomed to failure even if it was carried out to perfection.
Comment