ESPN's Take on Indy-Buffalo

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • ajsdx
    Registered User
    • Aug 2003
    • 1436
    #1

    ESPN's Take on Indy-Buffalo

    "Indianapolis Colts at Buffalo Bills: The Bills have gone three games without an offensive touchdown, and the fans are restless. So is owner Ralph Wilson. A lot of people wondered if offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride was going to keep his job this week. Of course, releasing any coach this late in the season is silly. Gilbride is bright, but the Bills are running out of offensive options. Travis Henry has a broken leg. Drew Bledsoe holds onto the ball too long because no one is open. Eric Moulds has a bad groin. The Bills are a mess and a seventh loss would virtually put them out of the playoff race. The Colts have their own worries. They don't have healthy wide receivers. They will probably give Marvin Harrison the week off to get his hamstring ready for next week's game against the Patriots. But this Colts team has shown great resiliency. The Colts have now won four games without either Harrison or running back Edgerrin James. The Bills are limiting opponents to 95 yards a game on the ground, but if Harrison is going to be out, Indy needs 100 out of James. That's the best matchup in the battle of former AFC East rivals."

    This article is interesting to me for two reasons: First, Harrison might be out (which is probably a good move on Indy's part, saving him for the playoffs), and second, Gilbride apparently has the respect of his peers. Clayton seems to think that Buffalo's offensive woes are due to Henry's injury, Bledsoe's judgement, and Moulds' groin, which reflect poorly on Gilbride. Isn't it the system that makes the players look worse, instead of the other way around?
    Tags: None
  • Jeff1220
    H to the 12:20
    • Jul 2002
    • 6137
    #2
    This was writer by a **it for brains sports writer - not one of Gilbride's 'peers'. His peers know - just blitz, that O can't stop it.

    Comment

    • JJamezz
       

      Administrator Emeritus
      • Jul 2002
      • 5626
      #3
      LMAO... Didn't he just say that Gilbride would be fired if we lost to the Colts??? Now its 'silly' to fire a coach this late in the season... What a tool.

      The only thing silly is that he wasn't let go or stripped of his play calling duties WEEKS ago.

      Comment

      • IHateTheDullphins
        New and Improved!!
        • Aug 2003
        • 1230
        #4
        What an idiot.
        Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"

        Comment

        • Jan Reimers
          Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
          • May 2003
          • 17353
          #5
          Gilbride is bright? Compared to what? A bag of dog ****?
          Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

          Comment

          • DIHARD2
            Registered User
            • Sep 2002
            • 1214
            #6
            It's not the plays that are bad it's the playcalling. They can still take the game calling away from Gilbride without firing him. They can even do it before the game starts without hurting our possibility of winning, if anything it would give us even a better advantage, seeing that the other team is game planning against Gilbride. Don't be surprised if that decision is made just before the game starts it would be interesting if they do.



            GOOooo!!!...BUFFALOOooo!!!!!.....
            "The right of free speech is the God given right of each man to make an ass of himself." B Franklin

            Comment

            • Moulds80
              Registered User
              • Oct 2003
              • 143
              #7
              Originally posted by Jan Reimers
              Gilbride is bright? Compared to what? A bag of dog ****?
              HEY! HOW DARE YOU MAKE FUN OF A BAG OF DOG ****!

              **picks up bag**

              You hurt its feelings Never compare my bag of poo to Gillbride.
              I Billieve, always have and always will. Praying for the playoffs.

              2004 World Sieres Champions; The Boston Red Sox.

              Proud member of both Red Sox Nation and Buffalo Nation

              Comment

              • Throne Logic
                Terry Tate - Outside Linebacker
                • Aug 2002
                • 2052
                #8
                Where's the link. This doesn't sound like something Clayton would have written. It's not consistent with what he has been writing.

                The system, itself, is too inconsistent. The QB isn't sure where any of his WR's are going to be while he's lined up shouting out his cadance. More importantly, he doesn't know where his "safety valve" will be. Kind of defeats the purpose of a safety valve, wouldn't you say? Which is particularly bad on this team, where Drew could certainly benefit from a consistent safety valve to dump too, instead of forcing stupid throws or taking a sack.
                Still searching for that offensive rhythm.

                Comment

                • SABURZFAN
                  short bus extraordinaire
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 50747
                  #9
                  Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                  Gilbride is bright? Compared to what? A bag of dog ****?
                  the jury is still out on that.
                  Originally posted by yordad
                  Christ, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.

                  Comment

                  • ajsdx
                    Registered User
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 1436
                    #10
                    Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                    Gilbride is bright? Compared to what? A bag of dog ****?
                    LOL.

                    Originally posted by Throne Logic
                    Where's the link. This doesn't sound like something Clayton would have written. It's not consistent with what he has been writing.
                    Yeah, I've always liked Clayton's writing. It's from his weekly "First and 10" article (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...ohn&id=1665831) -- The Bills Colts matchup is number 7 on his list; the excerpt I posted is the first half of his little analysis. Maybe he doesn't care that much about the other matchups after First.

                    Comment

                    • ajsdx
                      Registered User
                      • Aug 2003
                      • 1436
                      #11
                      Originally posted by ajsdx

                      the excerpt I posted is the first half of his little analysis.
                      my bad. it's actually the entire paragraph he writes on Bills Colts, not just the first half.

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X