Terrell Owens

[cablesabres68]

On the Eric moulds show a week or two ago Jim Brinson asked Eric what he thought the chances were that the Bills could get TO Eric replied very good and went on to say that him and TO were talking about were he would like to play next year since he will be a FA he said he wasn't thinkin about it then moulds said he brought up the possibility of him taking a pay cut to come play for Buffalo and he said he would love to come to play anywhere but San Francisco. Now I like the idea of him coming here and making our offense a whole lot better especially our WR's i would like to get you guys' feedback on this

Thx,
Cablesabres68

[BADTHINGSMAN]

I caught the show as well.. When the Bills put a offer for Johnson in a week ago, it showed they are looking for WR help.. TO is a headcase thats the problem.. He would speak up if he feels the Offense keeps doing things that dont work.. It also could create problems between Moulds and Owens.. I like it if

1. TO takes a paycut to come here..
2. TO must realize that Moulds is the #1 guy here..
3. TO also must learn how to show some better respect to his teammates..

[cablesabres68]

Yes TO is a head case but him and moulds are like best friends and maybe TO needs to play with a friend to keep him inline and him and moulds on either side and reed and shaw trading time in the slot and both used on 4 and 5 reciever sets and henry in the backfield with winslow jr. as the tight end our offense and defense will be set for a couple of years. As i was i think it would be really good for TO to play besides moulds

[Tatonka]

sorry.. but moulds would NOT bet the number 1 if TO came here.. TO is one of the top three wrs in the nfl.. moulds is not better.. to say he is, is nothing but blind homerism.

[BADTHINGSMAN]

Originally posted by Tatonka
sorry.. but moulds would NOT bet the number 1 if TO came here.. TO is one of the top three wrs in the nfl.. moulds is not better.. to say he is, is nothing but blind homerism.

I ment #1 on the team not the NFL..

[cablesabres68]

It really doesn't matter who is number one or two or three etc... man it's gotta be a team effort and if we pick up TO he would have to see that and i think moulds would help him realize that since they are such close friends

[Tatonka]

Originally posted by silent_one
I ment #1 on the team not the NFL..

that is what i am saying.. he would not be number one on this team anymore.. if TO and moulds are on the team.. it becomes

1a - TO
1b - EM

[BADTHINGSMAN]

There has to be a #1 WR on the offense.. Either way having Moulds and Owens on the same team, on the field at the same time would be unbeleviable..

[BADTHINGSMAN]

How old is TO anyway?? Isnt he like 29??

[cablesabres68]

yes but guys it doesn't matter who is 1 and who is two it would make our team full we can put points up on offense have an deffense that can keep teams to 17 pts and under and our special teams plays knock out.

[cablesabres68]

i think he is 26 or 27

[BillsFever]

Originally posted by silent_one
How old is TO anyway?? Isnt he like 29??


Originally posted by cablesabres68
i think he is 26 or 27

He came out in the same draft as Moulds. He's about 29 or 30.

[BADTHINGSMAN]

Thanks BillsFever for the info..

[BillsFever]

Terrell Owens #81 | Wide Receiver | San Francisco 49ers
Height: 6-3 Weight: 226 Born: Dec 7, 1973 - Alexander City, AL College: Chattanooga
Draft: 1996 - 3rd round (28th pick) by the San Francisco 49ers

Profile | Split Stats | Situational Stats | Career Stats | Game Log | News & Notes | Photos




Career Stats

Career Stats Receiving Kick Returns Punt Returns Fumbles
Season Team G Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng YAC 1stD TD KR Yds Avg Long PR Yds Avg Long Fum FumL
1996 San Francisco 16 35 520 32.5 14.9 46 6.1 23 4 3 47 15.7 18 0 0 0.0 0 1 1
1997 San Francisco 16 60 936 58.5 15.6 56 6.3 48 8 2 31 15.5 23 0 0 0.0 0 1 0
1998 San Francisco 16 67 1097 68.6 16.4 79 6.0 52 14 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 1 1
1999 San Francisco 14 60 754 53.9 12.6 36 4.2 36 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
2000 San Francisco 14 97 1451 103.6 15.0 69 6.6 65 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2
2001 San Francisco 16 93 1412 88.3 15.2 60 5.6 70 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2002 San Francisco 14 100 1300 92.9 13.0 76 6.0 61 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2003 San Francisco 10 56 791 79.1 14.1 75 4.8 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Career 116 568 8261 71.2 14.5 79 5.8 393 77 5 78 15.6 23 0 0 0.0 0 7 5

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/3664/career

[DraftBoy]

TO would be great, he is the best all around receiver in the NFL. Eric is great but hell even drew can heave the ball down the field. 3-step drop throw long and let either of them go get it. Plus you gotta love TO endzone celebrations.

[Voltron]

NOW imagine if we had a real O line and a real QB!! What a great All madden team it would be!


YEAH RIGHT :snicker:

We need to think about getting some line help on both sides of the ball. No more going on the cheap on a speed rusher of a DE. Time to stop with the cheese fixes ala Marcus Jones and lets get serious.

Rueben Brown either restructures or he is gone, pucillo and teague need to go as well.

We can't think about WR help when we have way more important things to work on

Football is won in the trenches and we don't have what we need on either side

[Mr. Cynical]

/agree voltron

...and besides, TO is an arrogant ass, regardless of his talent. I'd rather have someone with less talent but a great attitude.

[juice]

Originally posted by Tatonka
sorry.. but moulds would NOT bet the number 1 if TO came here.. TO is one of the top three wrs in the nfl.. moulds is not better.. to say he is, is nothing but blind homerism.

TO is the top reciever in the NFL bar none. ACC

[The_Philster]

Originally posted by juice
TO is the top reciever in the NFL bar none. ACC

Check the latest issue of Bills Digest. They did a poll on the top WRs from the 96 draft. Harrison was 1st, Moulds was 2nd, Owens was 3rd. And they were talking to scouts and other pro players...not fans.

[juice]

Either Moulds or TO would have Harrison type #'s if they had payton and the edge in the offense. YAC and overall big play making ability, also ability to get seperation I have to go with TO. The numbers Moulds and price put up last year in really half an ass effort by the "O" the second half is as impressive as the payton to harrison connection.

[cablesabres68]

We need to think about getting some line help on both sides of the ball. No more going on the cheap on a speed rusher of a DE. Time to stop with the cheese fixes ala Marcus Jones and lets get serious.

Rueben Brown either restructures or he is gone, pucillo and teague need to go as well.

We can't think about WR help when we have way more important things to work on

Football is won in the trenches and we don't have what we need on either side.

I agree but if we Get TO then we will have an offense like last year it is just bledsoe doesn't have a good enough reciever(besides moulds because of injury) to stretch the field like price did last year. now if we get TO it will give bledsoe another reciever who can get down field and he can dump it to henry if he needs to.

[IHateTheDullphins]

You all should stop smoking crack. This will only happen in your dream world. WACK

[Tatonka]

Originally posted by The_Philster
Check the latest issue of Bills Digest. They did a poll on the top WRs from the 96 draft. Harrison was 1st, Moulds was 2nd, Owens was 3rd. And they were talking to scouts and other pro players...not fans.


i dont care what scouts and others say.. harrison, moss, and to are the top three.. in no specific order.. and moulds is number 4.. his numbers say that.. over the coarse of his career.

[Tatonka]

if moulds wasnt allergic to the endzone like he normally is.. he may be tied with TO, and behind moss/harrison... but TO finds ways to break tackles and get TDs ... moulds always has low td numbers.

[The_Philster]

Originally posted by Tatonka
i dont care what scouts and others say.. harrison, moss, and to are the top three.. in no specific order.. and moulds is number 4.. his numbers say that.. over the coarse of his career.
numbers? You mean stats? What was it that Mark Twain said about stats? :scratch:
As far as Moss, he never was mentioned because the whole topic of the article was 96 draftees. I wouldn't rank Moss ahead of Moulds anyway.

[helmetguy]

Originally posted by The_Philster
numbers? You mean stats? What was it that Mark Twain said about stats? :scratch:


"There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned lies, and Statistics."