Draft King Mock- 2 days old

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MelK
    Working Incognito
    • Dec 2002
    • 485

    Draft King Mock- 2 days old

    2004 NFL Mock Draft

    Last Updated November 26, 2003

    Of course it's impossible to know how teams will finish this season. And, keeping that in mind, here's a first round mock draft executed with a projected order. If you feel that your favorite team was jilted, don't take it personally. It's merely a projection.


    1. Atlanta Falcons - Roy Williams, WR, Texas
    2. San Diego Chargers - Tommie Harris, DT, Oklahoma
    3. Jacksonville Jaguars - Rashaun Woods, WR, Oklahoma State
    4. Arizona Cardinals - Eli Manning, QB, Ole Miss
    5. Detroit Lions - Steven Jackson, RB, Oregon State
    6. Oakland Raiders - Vince Wilfork, DT, Miami
    7. New York Giants - Robert Gallery, OT, Iowa
    8. Cleveland Browns - Reggie Williams, WR, Washington
    9. Chicago Bears - Marcus Tubbs, DT, Texas
    10. Houston Texans - Shawn Andrews, OT, Arkansas
    11. Washington Redskins - Will Smith, DE, Ohio State
    12. Buffalo Bills - Kellen Winslow, TE, Miami
    13. New Orleans Saints - D.J. Williams, OLB, Miami
    14. Pittsburgh Steelers - Ben Troupe, TE, Florida
    15. San Francisco 49ers - Derrick Strait, CB, Oklahoma
    16. New York Jets - Lee Evans, WR, Wisconsin
    17. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Kevin Jones, RB, Virginia Tech
    18. Cincinnati Bengals - Marlin Jackson, CB, Michigan
    19. Denver Broncos - David Pollack, DE, Georgia
    20. Green Bay Packers - Sean Taylor, S, Miami
    21. New England Patriots (from Baltimore Ravens) - Chris Perry, RB, Michigan
    22. Seattle Seahawks - Chris Gamble, CB, Ohio State
    23. Miami Dolphins - Nat Dorsey, OT, Georgia Tech
    24. Minnesota Vikings - DeAngelo Hall, CB, Virginia Tech
    25. Philadelphia Eagles - Michael Clayton, WR, LSU
    26. New England Patriots - Jonathan Vilma, LB, Miami
    27. Dallas Cowboys - Michael Turner, RB, Northern Illinois
    28. Indianapolis Colts - Dunta Robinson, CB, South Carolina
    29. Carolina Panthers - Nathan Vasher, CB, Texas
    30. Tennessee Titans - J.P. Losman, QB, Tulane
    31. St. Louis Rams - Karlos Dansby, OLB, Auburn
    32. Kansas City Chiefs - Michael Jenkins, WR, Ohio State





    If the players fell the way they did here, I'd still skip TE Wnslow. I'd gran Taylor or even go for Vernon Carey- even though Ingtar doesn't like Guards going that high. I think Carey is athletic and versatile enough (can play tackle as well) to fill a need here. Trading down would be an option as well
  • Winfield_26
    Administrator
    • Jul 2002
    • 107452

    #2
    I dont want another Shockey. Hes got great talent but no brains.

    Depending on whether we resign Winfield why dont we take Straight, or Jackson. Pollack also would be nice. Taylor also is an option but if we get him Id rather have Winfield resigned so we arent losing two key tackling DB's in Pierson and Winfield.
    COMING SOON...
    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

    Comment

    • nolimit
      Member of the Official Drew Bledsoe Truce!
      • Aug 2003
      • 542

      #3
      I think Kellen winslow is the answer to alot of our problems on offense! I know people have a problem with his attitude but the kid has got skills! I forget who said it, but by drafting winslow he alone would make our offense 100% better without changing a thing from this years line up!

      If he is there, TD will take him!

      Comment

      • Jan Reimers
        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
        • May 2003
        • 17353

        #4
        We have far greater needs than TE, to wit, DE, OL, QB, WR. Therefore, TD will probably take Winslow and ignore our more pressing problems as he did last year.
        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

        Comment

        • Dozerdog
          In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.

          Administrator Emeritus
          • Jul 2002
          • 42586

          #5
          Are you in favor of drafting average talent to fill a need or drafting a superstar if he's available?


          Drafting an average player for need just means you will be drafting that position again "for need" in a few years- Top 5 players don't come often - especially when you consider where we were drafting and who's available

          Comment

          • Jan Reimers
            Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
            • May 2003
            • 17353

            #6
            How about a superstar QB, WR, DE, DT or FS, i.e., a superstar at a position that we really need?
            Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

            Comment

            • clumping platelets

              #7
              Sean Taylor

              Comment

              • Dozerdog
                In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.

                Administrator Emeritus
                • Jul 2002
                • 42586

                #8
                Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                We have far greater needs than TE, to wit, DE, OL, QB, WR. Therefore, TD will probably take Winslow and ignore our more pressing problems as he did last year.
                Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                How about a superstar QB, WR, DE, DT or FS, i.e., a superstar at a position that we really need?
                Obviously, if the position of need has a superstar- take the guy.

                But you're complaining about McGahee getting picked instead of us going after a need position- did you want a William Joseph instead? He can't get off the bench.

                If you were TD, who was your "Superstar QB, WR, DE, DT or FS" that we were to pick at 22?

                Comment

                • clumping platelets

                  #9
                  If you use hindsight and look back at the rest of the 1st rd after McGahee, only one player has made an impact and that is LB Nick Barnett with the Packers. 1st pick in rd 2, OL Steinbach has played well, BUT then you go all the way down to pick #54 of the draft to find another player who has had any true impact, WR Anquan Boldin.

                  The draft is not for 1 season, it's for the long term. It's easy to look back and say we should have drafted so and so.

                  Comment

                  • Dozerdog
                    In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.

                    Administrator Emeritus
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 42586

                    #10
                    Isn't Hamlin (S)with Seattle having a good season? I know he started right away and had a good first half of the season

                    Comment

                    • clumping platelets

                      #11
                      I actually think his playing time has decreased, however, I believe most of the attention going his way was due to some of his hits on receivers.

                      Comment

                      • yledust
                        Beerophile
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 6539

                        #12
                        There is no reason we can't at least get a really good guard or center in the first half of the draft. If we can't get a stud (DE, or WR) we need to fix the lines. If you can't protect the QB, and you can't create pressure with your front 4, that is where you have to draft first.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X