One bright spot from yesterday.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zone
    No, look. I do mind. The Dude minds.
    • Oct 2003
    • 2535

    One bright spot from yesterday.

    This guy is the real deal.

    His special teams play alone is the best I have seen since Tasker.

    Also his limited play on defense has been extremely solid if not excelent. He has 2 picks, only 1 less then Clements (who leads the team with 3) a sack, and a forced fumble. 27 total tackles with only limited play in 13 games. I think we really missed him last week, I don't know why he was not playing on d. Maybee if he was in he could have picked up some of Winfields slack.

    IMO we can expect very good things to come from #24.
    www.blzbus.com
  • lordofgun
    in charge of you

    Administrator Emeritus
    • Jul 2002
    • 48416

    #2
    I agree. THe kid is playing very well.

    Last year's draft was definitely not a bust.






    <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com/index.php?page=buzzbite&amp;BB_id=119588">Do you like me?</a> | <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com">BuzzDash polls</a>

    Comment

    • Ebenezer
      Give me a minute...
      • Jul 2002
      • 73867

      #3
      Originally posted by lordofgun
      I agree. THe kid is playing very well.

      Last year's draft was definitely not a bust.
      Don't get your knickers in an uproar just yet, he's not ready to take over for Winfield.




      For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

      Comment

      • zone
        No, look. I do mind. The Dude minds.
        • Oct 2003
        • 2535

        #4
        Originally posted by Ebenezer
        Don't get your knickers in an uproar just yet, he's not ready to take over for Winfield.
        Yea he still knows how to picks the ball off and cover recievers....
        www.blzbus.com

        Comment

        • The_Philster
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 52180

          #5
          being placed a minimum of 5-7 yards off the ball every play doesn't help you cover.
          The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

          Comment

          • zone
            No, look. I do mind. The Dude minds.
            • Oct 2003
            • 2535

            #6
            Originally posted by The_Philster
            being placed a minimum of 5-7 yards off the ball every play doesn't help you cover.
            At CB you dictate how far you play of the reciever, yes I know the coverage dictates what you are suposed to play, but the individule player judges what he needs to keep coverage. Clements seems to do a fine job on the other side.
            www.blzbus.com

            Comment

            • The_Philster
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 52180

              #7
              Originally posted by zone
              At CB you dictate how far you play of the reciever, yes I know the coverage dictates what you are suposed to play, but the individule player judges what he needs to keep coverage. Clements seems to do a fine job on the other side.
              The coverage is dictated by the play call and they throw to Antoine's side quite a bit more than Nate's if I'm not mistaken.
              The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

              Comment

              • zone
                No, look. I do mind. The Dude minds.
                • Oct 2003
                • 2535

                #8
                Originally posted by The_Philster
                The coverage is dictated by the play call and they throw to Antoine's side quite a bit more than Nate's if I'm not mistaken.
                I understand that, but you ajust once the balls snaped to your speed. So any distance keeped after the ball is snaped if it's man coverage falls on the CB's shoulder not the play call. If it's zone that's a diffrent story.
                www.blzbus.com

                Comment

                • The_Philster
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 52180

                  #9
                  Only thing is, it's a big help to the CB to be placed in tight coverage (a yard or two away from the LOS, max) because he can jam the receiver at the line and disrupt the route enough that he can read the receiver's moves more easily. With the way they have been playing Antoine, he can't touch the WR until he's in the process of catching the ball.
                  The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

                  Comment

                  • lordofgun
                    in charge of you

                    Administrator Emeritus
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 48416

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Ebenezer
                    Don't get your knickers in an uproar just yet, he's not ready to take over for Winfield.
                    I never said he'd be a pro-bowl corner if we put him in there.

                    But then again...neither is Winfield.






                    <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com/index.php?page=buzzbite&amp;BB_id=119588">Do you like me?</a> | <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com">BuzzDash polls</a>

                    Comment

                    • IHateTheDullphins
                      New and Improved!!
                      • Aug 2003
                      • 1230

                      #11
                      McGee may not be ready to take over for AW yet, but he certainly is on the fast track to that goal. How can you not notice his high level of play for such a young rookie.
                      Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"

                      Comment

                      • helmetguy
                        Touch the helmet for luck
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 5949

                        #12
                        Originally posted by The_Philster
                        Only thing is, it's a big help to the CB to be placed in tight coverage (a yard or two away from the LOS, max) because he can jam the receiver at the line and disrupt the route enough that he can read the receiver's moves more easily. With the way they have been playing Antoine, he can't touch the WR until he's in the process of catching the ball.
                        Also, with that 5-7 yard cushion, Winfield almost in variably ends up taking a "bail" move at the snap, in order to keep up with the receiver. With that, he ends up in man-under/over with no safety help. If he were used in "press" more often (since he usually ends up facing the opponents' #1 WR, he'd have more of a chance to "steer" the WR toward the coverage. That's what Miami was doing to the Bills' WRs all day long yesterday.

                        Whatever happens with Winfield, I think TD has already considered most of the scenarios. I like the kid McGee. He looks like he could really develop and produce. That's good, since I STILL have nightmares from the "J.D. Williams Experiment."
                        Someone said "What's he gonna turn out like?" Ha!
                        And someone else said "Never mind!"

                        -Deep Purple

                        "Have you ever taken a crap so big your pants fit better?"--Ron White

                        Comment

                        • zone
                          No, look. I do mind. The Dude minds.
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 2535

                          #13
                          [i] I like the kid McGee. He looks like he could really develop and produce. [/B]
                          That's what I am saying.... wish we could have gotten more opinions on this one, maybee people have not been watching him much. I don't know how you could miss his special teams play though.....
                          www.blzbus.com

                          Comment

                          • TigerJ
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 22575

                            #14
                            I haven't watched too closely, but I like what little I've seen. He seems to have plenty of speed and moxie. I did specifically look to see if he had the backpedal problem that was reported when he was drafted. He looked like he backpedaled OK to me. Maybe his college coach never showed him how.
                            I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                            I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                            Comment

                            • the dude
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 110

                              #15
                              Someone commented about Winfield's problems in coverage last Sunday ... look, they completed one pass on Winfield despite decent coverage. They totaled less than 50 yards passing. let's not blame the wrong side of the ball for that Miami fiasco.

                              I do think McGee has potential but we will need an experienced replacement for Winfield if we want to keep our defense strong.
                              Last edited by the dude; 12-27-2003, 03:14 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X