Salisbury, ESPN, names Bledsoe "LVP"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stuckincincy
    Buffalo Bills Fan
    • Sep 2003
    • 15084

    Salisbury, ESPN, names Bledsoe "LVP"

    I was watching ESPN Sportcenter at abt. 110:30 AM today. Commentator Sean Salisbury was running down his choices for Rookie of the Year (Boldin), league MVP (McNair) and so forth.

    He named Bledsoe the NFL's "Least Valuable Player"

    Ouch.
    Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.
  • The Natrix
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 7305

    #2
    I agree. Never have I seen one player hurt their team to the extent that Bledsoe has. There are players in the league with less talent, but they are on the bench or not making mistakes if on the field.



    Byrd.

    Comment

    • Fairway To Green
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 42348

      #3
      Oh come on guys..........................it was not Bledsoes fault.......................it was everyone around him. He does not deserve any blame.

      Comment

      • HenryRules
        • Jul 2002
        • 2757

        #4
        Originally posted by Fairway To Green
        Oh come on guys..........................it was not Bledsoes fault.......................it was everyone around him. He does not deserve any blame.
        Why are the only options that he deserves none of the blame or all of the blame?

        What about the realistic view that some of us have that he a part of the problem - not the entire problem.

        Comment

        • stuckincincy
          Buffalo Bills Fan
          • Sep 2003
          • 15084

          #5
          True. But he's a substantial part. That the coaching/playcalling has been abysamal, well that goes without saying.

          But it is not an unreasonable expectation to think that a 10-year qb vet would check off now again, it is not unreasonable to expect a 10-year qb vet to scream bloody murder at a clown of an OC.

          Sadly, I think he's just playing out the string.

          Terrible leadership, non-existant leadership. I had expected a lot better from Ddrew.
          Last edited by stuckincincy; 12-26-2003, 01:41 PM.
          Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

          Comment

          • stuckincincy
            Buffalo Bills Fan
            • Sep 2003
            • 15084

            #6
            whoops..double post.
            Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

            Comment

            • pats-were-right
              Just paint a target on my forehead
              • Dec 2003
              • 342

              #7
              Ahhh, as Gladys Knight sang: Memories... like the corners of my mind. . . misty water-colored memories...............ofthePatriotsinthesecondhalfof 1999andallof2000

              Comment

              • pats-were-right
                Just paint a target on my forehead
                • Dec 2003
                • 342

                #8
                AND............the preseasonandfirsttwogamesofthe2001seasonthankgodforMoLewis.

                Comment

                • Fairway To Green
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 42348

                  #9
                  Originally posted by HenryRules


                  Why are the only options that he deserves none of the blame or all of the blame?

                  What about the realistic view that some of us have that he a part of the problem - not the entire problem.


                  Aside from Gilbride he is the biggest part of the problem!!! The sarcasm is brought on by all the excuses made here for him. There is a group that blames everything around him but does not want him to share any blame. They refer to him as "savior"

                  Read todays Buffalo News. He is not making excuses for himself. I give him credit for that.

                  I know he has not had ideal blocking and playcalling this year. HE has been awful though. Can't lay all the blame on other things

                  Comment

                  • The_Philster
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 52180

                    #10
                    Originally posted by HenryRules
                    Why are the only options that he deserves none of the blame or all of the blame?

                    What about the realistic view that some of us have that he a part of the problem - not the entire problem.


                    Nah...that's too easy. Too much like the crazy idea that there are 53 guys on the roster.
                    The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

                    Comment

                    • Fairway To Green
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 42348

                      #11
                      Originally posted by The_Philster




                      Nah...that's too easy. Too much like the crazy idea that there are 53 guys on the roster.


                      Does that mean all 53 players are equally responsible when a team loses?

                      Comment

                      • The_Philster
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 52180

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Fairway To Green
                        Does that mean all 53 players are equally responsible when a team loses?
                        Not at all....but the QB gets an unfair share of the blame/credit. It was always because of Flutie that we won in 98 and 99, etc, etc.
                        That ring a bell? Cause that's all I ever heard when I was on usenet...it was all dependent on the QB.
                        The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

                        Comment

                        • stuckincincy
                          Buffalo Bills Fan
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 15084

                          #13
                          The ESSENCE of the qb position, why they command the big $$$$'s, is because they can CHANGE things.

                          Example: several years ago, the B'gals picked up QB Neil O'Donnell. Was on one of cinty's famous 12-year stretch of losing teams. No OL. No DL . No CB's or FS/SS. One loudmouth decent reciever, Carl Pickens.

                          The team had tons of injuriers.

                          A coaching staff pummmeled and jerked around by the ownership.

                          That team finished, I forget, 4-12 or 5-11. O'Donnell had 12 or 13 TD's. And only TWO int's. He did what you would expect a vet to do.

                          Given the problems, O'Donnell played well. He saw defenses and changed plays; the supporting cast was wanting though. He used the tools at his disposal. He used his experience to advantage.

                          He was booed out of town, only to go to the Titans and go 4-0 in McNair's absence.

                          Bledsoe, IMHO, shows a serious lack of moxie. If the bills perchance woulda signed Blake or a guy like O'Donnell, or saved the #1 and moved up to pick Ramsey instead of moving up to pick Ryan Denney, things might have been different...
                          Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

                          Comment

                          • pats-were-right
                            Just paint a target on my forehead
                            • Dec 2003
                            • 342

                            #14
                            Another example is those bad niners teams of a few years ago where Garcia still made the pro-bowl.

                            Comment

                            • justasportsfan
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 71579

                              #15
                              Originally posted by The_Philster




                              Nah...that's too easy. Too much like the crazy idea that there are 53 guys on the roster.
                              Let's say half of that 53 roster are problems/liabilities and the other half are assets to the team. What half do you think Drew belongs to?

                              Yeah, we pay him 6 million to be part of the problem. Not everyone in national media know what they are talking about but the fact that someone thinks he's an LVP means a whole lot. If anyone even "considered " him to be a problem means we are overpaying a qb.
                              Last edited by justasportsfan; 12-26-2003, 03:49 PM.
                              sacrifice1
                              https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X