Rumored five year deal tells us ...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Bmax
    Registered User
    • Aug 2003
    • 1711
    #1

    Rumored five year deal tells us ...

    That the bills will be patient with mularkey. I'm not saying he will have loads of time. But some time .. A 9-7 season without the playoffs may be ok in season one but he will have to make the playoffs and win by year two.. Then in year three the playoffs again and go far....


    Ithink year one playoffs are not out of the question .. The keys to me are the o- line, receving core and creating more turnovers on def.


    Let's not forget we still need a speed rusher to develope opposite schobel ....

    I think with lebeau we have a very good chance of being a better def..

    Bmax...
    Tags: None
  • Bill Brasky
    Drives an ice cream truck covered in human skulls
    • Jan 2004
    • 66218
    #2
    Re: Rumored five year deal tells us ...

    Originally posted by Bmax

    Let's not forget we still need a speed rusher to develope opposite schobel ....
    thats exactly what we need... better pass rush = more turnovers

    Comment

    • venis2k1
      Youboty can hope
      • Jul 2002
      • 4621
      #3
      our team is getting old big pat, moulds, bledsoe, sam adams, milloy, r brown, we cant be patient too long

      Comment

      • G. Host
        Banned
        • Jul 2002
        • 10298
        #4
        I think they just negotiated a 5 year deal because that is how much ($5 million) M&M wanted to take head coaching job and this way he gets paid either way that much.

        Think of it as a 2nd round draft pick.

        It is on scale for coordinators at first head coach job.

        Comment

        • Demon
          Registered User
          • Mar 2003
          • 4047
          #5
          AP is reporting it's a 5 year deal, worth $7.5 million. Same deal as Jim Mora Jr got in Atlanta.

          http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZ2NvMjltBF9TAzk1ODYxMDU5BHNlYwN0aA--?slug=ap-bills-mularkey&prov=ap&type=lgns
          Impossible is Nothing.


          Comment

          • Jan Reimers
            Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
            • May 2003
            • 17353
            #6
            Originally posted by venis2k1
            our team is getting old big pat, moulds, bledsoe, sam adams, milloy, r brown, we cant be patient too long
            I couldn't agree more. Age, free agency and the salary cap give almost every team a very limited window of opportunity. We can't waste our good D taking a couple of years to rebuild our O.
            Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

            Comment

            • doug45
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 1331
              #7
              Originally posted by venis2k1
              our team is getting old big pat, moulds, bledsoe, sam adams, milloy, r brown, we cant be patient too long

              Comment

              • Kelly The Dog
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 445
                #8
                I think those guys have three years of prime play in them before they are old. The team is ready now and we need Mularkey to win now. There should be no learning curve. The contract, to me, is a very good one. All contracts are guaranteed. If MM is a bust it is not a helluva lot to buy him out the last two years. If he is a gem, it's extremely cheap for a top coach three or four years from now. It's the going rate for a guy that has only coordinator experience and it is not ceap by league standards. It's a good, fair contract that could prove fabulous but won't kill Ralph.

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                X