If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
I think MM will go to a more conservative O. He may be bringing in a lot of coaches with experience, such as Sam, but at the end of the day, I think he stays with a running/ball-control team and forgoes any trick offense.
DB said last year's plays were too complex anyway, and if they are going to get him back on track, they need to get back to basics and simplify the gameplan IMO.
Originally posted by caveboy I think MM will go to a more conservative O. He may be bringing in a lot of coaches with experience, such as Sam, but at the end of the day, I think he stays with a running/ball-control team and forgoes any trick offense.
DB said last year's plays were too complex anyway, and if they are going to get him back on track, they need to get back to basics and simplify the gameplan IMO.
I wouldn't say he's conservative I would say more like a balanced attack see 2001 and 2002 when hios offese were ranked in the top 10 for both passing offense and rushing offense.
SW would help out our offense a great deal, and i hope we get him. As for someone suggesting that we he should or will implement the no huddle, there is no way our line could handle that tall task.
If you walk with Jesus today, you don't have anything to worry about tomorrow...
Originally posted by ShadowHawk7 what was the Sugar Huddle neway?
They woudl come into with the huddle with like 12-13 players then when they would break the huddle the 1-2 other players would go back to the sidelines confusing the defense.
The Bengals no huddle, which as has been stated is now illegal, was all about trying to deceive defences. The no huddle as Ted Marchibroda perfected it was about depriving the defence of the opportunity to make substitutions, and wearing out defences on the assumption that defensive players, having to react to what the offence is doing, burn more energy than offensive players. I don't think the no huddle is behind the thought of bringing Wyche on board. He is a smart offensive guy who works well with QBs. That's all I'm looking for.
I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
I was more of a fan of Wyche's QB- Head Coach argument play. The QB sets up under center and starts his calls. The head coach then starts yelling at the QB, the QB yells back, starts walking over to the sidelines, yelling all the way, while the center hikes the ball to a back, starting the play. It never worked, but it was alot of fun to watch.
Comment