Who is the better receiver?

[The Natrix]

who would you rather have?

[Fat Tony]

How much are we paying for either of these two?

[The Natrix]

the same

[The Spaz]

Darrell Jackson he has been more consistent than Peerless and he doesn't complain like PP either.

[tampabay25690]

I vote for JAckson...And he is cheaper

[Fat Tony]

Don't wan't Peerless for $5 million a year, but he's marginally a better WR

[mypoorfriendme]

peerless just because his name is a lot cooler

[kgun12]

Jackson. PP got a big mouth and an attitude.

[The Natrix]

6 - 3 Peerless is winning

The people have spoken.

[Tatonka]

there is no way in hell that peerless and his ONE good season is better than jackson.

[OpIv37]

Originally posted by Tatonka
there is no way in hell that peerless and his ONE good season is better than jackson.

I've never watched Jackson play, but I do know that Peerless has had only one good year, and it was on a pass-happy offense with a QB who threw for 4000 yards... Price doesn't seem to do so well during more typical NFL seasons.

[madness]

Price = Overrated

[Akhippo]

Peerless, he can actually catch the easy passes.

[The Spaz]

Originally posted by Akhippo
Peerless, he can actually catch the easy passes.


Darrell Jackson must catch enough to put up the yardage he has over the years.

[Tatonka]

darrell jackson has been the number one receiver on the seahawks since his 2nd year.. peerless does not have the ability to be a number one. period.. that in itself says enough for me.

jackson = good number 1, incredible number 2
peerless = marginal to crappy #1, good #2.

[MTBillsFan]

Peerless "I'm not worth the" Price had his chance to be great if he had stayed in Buffalo. Now he's destined to become another run of the mill wannabe #1 recievers. He needs a dude like Moulds on the otherside to be effective.
GO BILLS!