If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Originally posted by DraftBoy I agree with all of those and possible Sidney, AVP, Brown, Pucillo.
Yeah definitely Sidney. QB's I would say yes to both but more so to Brown. Pucillo is a good candidate for sure. Brown I agree with as well as he is due a 1.8 million dollar bonus the day the season starts just heard that on WNSA radio.
Moore--$1 mil
Prioleau--depending on when the workout bonus is payable--$600K
Reese--$750K
Sidney is a FA
AVP--if before 6/1--$600K
Brown-$1.8 mil
Pucillio-$380K
Remember to subtract $300K from these amount to make up for the person who replaces them on the roster.
For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.
Is Ruben unwilling to restructure? That would seem to be a better approach with him. None of the other guys mentioned would be missed too much.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Originally posted by Jan Reimers Is Ruben unwilling to restructure? That would seem to be a better approach with him. None of the other guys mentioned would be missed too much.
He is quoted in Sunday's paper as willing to take a paycut.
Originally posted by The_Philster He is quoted in Sunday's paper as willing to take a paycut.
Thanks, Phil. Let's keep him if that's the case.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment