Winfield loss like Peerless last year...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DraftBoy
    Administrator
    • Jul 2002
    • 107444

    Winfield loss like Peerless last year...

    I think this is gonna come back to bit us in the ass like not having a compliment WR to Moulds did last season when we lost Peerless. I hope to god Im wrong but Im not feeling good about this at all so far....
    COMING SOON...
    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
  • The Spaz
    Registered User
    • Mar 2003
    • 19066

    #2
    Well woudl have been worth putting that kind of money on a guy who doesn't make plays? Grant it he was solid but they're are quite a few of those guys.

    Comment

    • Pride
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 10191

      #3
      I disagree

      The loss of peerless wasnt our problem last year...

      Hell if you looko back, back in 2002, they only played well the first 8 games... the problem is, people figured out if they blitz bledsoe, he doesnt have the time to sit back and sling it.

      it had nothing to do with peerless, it had to do with the offensive gameplan, and the lack of a significant running game.

      Comment

      • Gunzlingr
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 45976

        #4
        Bidness is Bidness. He obviously didn't want to be here. I wish him well except when he plays us. Sayonara!
        You think you're hot **** in a champagne glass, but you're really cold diarrhea in a Dixie cup!

        Comment

        • Devin
          The Octagon
          • Apr 2003
          • 23878

          #5
          ill feel a WHOLE LOT better when a CB is signed until then the feeling is mutual part of our secondary was how Nate and toine complimented one another.
          http://gridironjunkies.net/forums/index.php

          Comment

          • lordofgun
            in charge of you

            Administrator Emeritus
            • Jul 2002
            • 48416

            #6
            I don't wish him well at all!

            I'll wait to see who we sign to say if it will bite us.






            <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com/index.php?page=buzzbite&amp;BB_id=119588">Do you like me?</a> | <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com">BuzzDash polls</a>

            Comment

            • DraftBoy
              Administrator
              • Jul 2002
              • 107444

              #7
              Like Philster has pointed out its hard to make plays 8 yards off the ball...He should of had more picks, but he rarely got burned and was the surest tackler and one of the fastes players on the D, mark my words I think it will come back to bite us....esp if we dont get Vincent.
              COMING SOON...
              Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
              We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

              Comment

              • justasportsfan
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 71630

                #8
                Peerless wouldn't have been a big loss if we ran the ball more.
                sacrifice1
                https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                Comment

                • The Spaz
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 19066

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Pride
                  I disagree

                  The loss of peerless wasnt our problem last year...

                  Hell if you looko back, back in 2002, they only played well the first 8 games... the problem is, people figured out if they blitz bledsoe, he doesnt have the time to sit back and sling it.

                  it had nothing to do with peerless, it had to do with the offensive gameplan, and the lack of a significant running game.
                  Good point!

                  Comment

                  • DraftBoy
                    Administrator
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 107444

                    #10
                    I see alot of ifs in posts by justa and Pride (sorry dont know how to multi quote) and thats true and I agree with both but the simple fact was this:

                    We liked to throw the ball, we all knew this. Moulds got DT'd and he was hurt and it hurt our Offense by alot. We missed PP. I hope I'm wrong but I dont like the looks of the DB right now, b.c I dont like Clements at all b.c he gambles too often and doesnt make enough plays for all his gambels.
                    COMING SOON...
                    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • BuffaloBillsSTAMPEDE
                      Hall of Fame Zoner
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 9557

                      #11
                      vincent is just flat out better then winfield

                      Comment

                      • The Natrix
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 7305

                        #12
                        Re: Winfield loss like Peerless last year...

                        Originally posted by DraftBoy
                        I think this is gonna come back to bit us in the ass like not having a compliment WR to Moulds did last season when we lost Peerless. I hope to god Im wrong but Im not feeling good about this at all so far....
                        How on earth can you say this when you don't even know who his replacement is?

                        Vincent in place of Winfield would be a wash.

                        Shaw for Price is a downgrade.



                        Byrd.

                        Comment

                        • DraftBoy
                          Administrator
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 107444

                          #13
                          Originally posted by BuffaloBillsSTAMPEDE
                          vincent is just flat out better then winfield
                          Maybe 3 years ago but not now
                          COMING SOON...
                          Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                          We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                          Comment

                          • Lefty2985
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 216

                            #14
                            I think price was a bigger loss because he was a bigger impact player who could make plays! Antoine was a great run stopper but he doesnt make the big play when need.

                            Comment

                            • DraftBoy
                              Administrator
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 107444

                              #15
                              Re: Re: Winfield loss like Peerless last year...

                              Originally posted by The Natrix


                              How on earth can you say this when you don't even know who his replacement is?

                              Vincent in place of Winfield would be a wash.

                              Shaw for Price is a downgrade.
                              Pure speculation, and by the fact that Vincent left for another visit with Cincy, and our fall back option is either McGee (who I like alot but needs more time) and Washington who is worse than Vincent.
                              COMING SOON...
                              Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                              We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X