You can't tell me that the Bills

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ron C.
    Registered User
    • Mar 2003
    • 110

    You can't tell me that the Bills

    couldn't have squeezed out a 2nd round pick from a team like the Jets for Winfield. As I have said before, we could have transition tagged AW (average of top 10 salaries) and traded his rights to the highest bidder. There is no way AW would have immediately signed the transition tender and passed up signing bonus money. The transition tag could have been withdrawn at any time. The only negative is that 5.something million would have had to be available under the cap for a few days until a deal was done.
  • The Spaz
    Registered User
    • Mar 2003
    • 19066

    #2
    Re: You can't tell me that the Bills

    Originally posted by Ron C.
    couldn't have squeezed out a 2nd round pick from a team like the Jets for Winfield. As I have said before, we could have transition tagged AW (average of top 10 salaries) and traded his rights to the highest bidder. There is no way AW would have immediately signed the transition tender and passed up signing bonus money. The transition tag could have been withdrawn at any time. The only negative is that 5.something million would have had to be available under the cap for a few days until a deal was done.
    I thought that if you franchised a player it is a given the compensation would be a 1st round pick.

    Comment

    • kardshark19
      I will splash the pot whenever the hell I want!
      • Aug 2002
      • 2859

      #3
      I don't think we had a transition available. Only a franchise tag. May be wrong tho.
      ******************************************
      If you don't like your job, you don't strike; you just go in every day and do it really half assed. That's the American way. - Homer Simpson

      "In the poker game of life, women are the rake. They are the f**kin' rake."

      Comment

      • don137
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 7720

        #4
        One small problem with that theory. The Bills didn't have a transition tag left.

        Comment

        • Romes
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 5766

          #5
          I can tell you that the bills couldn't have squeezed a 2nd round pick for Winfield because the Bills didn't have a transition tag to use.

          They used their transition tag a few years back.

          But also the transition tag just means that with any offer the Bills would have the right to match it. There is no compensation for a transition tag.
          Originally posted by paladin warrior
          RALPH is drove me nut.

          Comment

          • TheGhostofJimKelly
            Registered User
            • May 2003
            • 12459

            #6
            The only way that is possible is if the Bills were willing to take on Winfield's contract. What if they didn't get a buyer. They would be stuck with a player that for all intensive purposes they don't want anymore. Last year they were willing to take on Price but they didn't have to when Atlanta came calling.

            Comment

            • Tatonka
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 21289

              #7
              how can guys like walter jones get franchised over and over.. how do they still have the franchise tag after using it twice but we use the transition tag a few year back and still dont have it available?
              "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

              Comment

              • Ron C.
                Registered User
                • Mar 2003
                • 110

                #8
                There are 3 types of tags (any of which a team can use):

                1. Exclusive rights Franchise tag- No other team can touch the player

                2. Franchise tag with compensation- two 1st round choices due the team who loses the player if they choose not to match

                3. Transition tag- option to match, no compensation (unless team is willing to match and trade)

                Comment

                • Ron C.
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 110

                  #9
                  They would be stuck with a player that for all intensive purposes they don't want anymore.
                  The transition tag can be withdrawn at any time (as long as the player hasn't already signed the tender)

                  Comment

                  • Ron C.
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 110

                    #10
                    They used their transition tag a few years back.
                    You are confusing this version of the tag with the original, one time only, transition tag we used when we lost Will Woolford to the Colts?

                    Either way, it seems like a missed opportunity.

                    Comment

                    • Throne Logic
                      Terry Tate - Outside Linebacker
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 2052

                      #11
                      So why don't we have a transition tag? Is someone currently tagged?
                      Still searching for that offensive rhythm.

                      Comment

                      • Forward_Lateral
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 29897

                        #12
                        I don't understand the franchise tag fully either. Someone from Jacksonville (I think Darius) has been franchised like 2 years in a row, is there a limit to this, or can you franchise a guy for his whole career?

                        Comment

                        • Jeff1220
                          H to the 12:20
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 6137

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ron C.


                          You are confusing this version of the tag with the original, one time only, transition tag we used when we lost Will Woolford to the Colts?

                          Either way, it seems like a missed opportunity.
                          I didn't know there was a new transition tag. When did that happen? As far as I know the transition tag was created as a one time thing to help teams transition into the current form of free agency. Once used, it's gone. The teams that have used them recently, never did before.

                          Comment

                          • Jeff1220
                            H to the 12:20
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 6137

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Forward_Lateral
                            I don't understand the franchise tag fully either. Someone from Jacksonville (I think Darius) has been franchised like 2 years in a row, is there a limit to this, or can you franchise a guy for his whole career?
                            If the guy plays for the team under the tag agreement for 1 year, the tag is then over and can be reused, on the same player if necessary. Of course that means continually paying that player the top 5 salary at the position. If a long term agreement is made with a tagged player, the tag, I think, cannot be used again until that contract is up.

                            Comment

                            • Jeff1220
                              H to the 12:20
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 6137

                              #15
                              ...at least that's the way I understand it. I could be wrong.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X