PDA

View Full Version : Clump's Power Rankings


clumping platelets
10-16-2002, 07:13 AM
http://www.billszone.com/YourSite/global/templates/view.php?action=YourSite_content&month=10&state=news&nid=1822


Fire away!!
Ebenezer
10-16-2002, 07:20 AM
YES!! Miami is #1...may clumpy's curse work again this week!!

Carolina 25??? TOLD YA!!

San Diego starts real season this week..they'll fall.

Cincy only 32?? The Bye week is better.
EricStratton
10-16-2002, 07:37 AM
Nice ranking Clump. Any team in the top 5 could be in any on those spots. I’d put the Saints #1, Tampa #2 and Miami #3 but that’s just me. One question is how can the Steelers go from #24 to #13 after a win over the terrible Bengals.
Novacane
10-16-2002, 07:45 AM
I'd say it's pretty accurate. Clump oviously puts a lot more thought into his rankings than WCF does.

I agree with ES that Steelers need to show more before I'm a believer. Will win thier division by default! Browns are big dissapointment. Should be 1-5.
clumping platelets
10-16-2002, 07:59 AM
That's is a problem (Pitt #24 to #13) but their is a gap. Can you rank the Bills or Cards higher? I think this middle gap will be filled in somewhat with some of the match ups.
EricStratton
10-16-2002, 08:05 AM
I could put anyone from 15-19 above Pittsburg. The Steelers haven't shown me anything yet but maybe Maddox is the guy to bring them around.
LouGrant
10-16-2002, 08:13 AM
I think some people are biased on the Cardinals based on history.

They have won more than they lost, and have managed to do this via a ground game that has been hampered by injuries to RBs Thomas and Marcel Shipp.

I'd put them up there ahead of the lifeless Pittsburgh Plastics ....er...Steelers
clumping platelets
10-16-2002, 08:16 AM
I did mention that bias.......Cards also have a history of barely winning games. They beat Carolina convincingly and they could be a big riser :)
TigerJ
10-16-2002, 09:20 AM
CP, you may have that silly avatar (which I like) but it's obvious you take your football seriously. I wouldn't want to even try to do a better ranking.
clumping platelets
10-16-2002, 09:36 AM
Awww.......shucks!!


Mucho gracias!! :)
WG
10-16-2002, 10:05 AM
Buffalo ahead of K.C. Wow!

K.C. is much more balanced on O and has scored more than we have while doing it in a significantly more balanced style w/ about twice the rushing yards/game. Their D allows less than we do.

Interesting...
Earthquake Enyart
10-16-2002, 10:39 AM
Indy and Baltimore are too high.

Arizona and da Bears are too low.
ArcticWildMan
10-16-2002, 10:40 AM
Originally posted by Ebenezer

Cincy only 32?? The Bye week is better.



:lol:
clumping platelets
10-16-2002, 10:43 AM
Poor Bungals fans :(
ublinkwescore
10-16-2002, 10:50 AM
How can you rank the Steelers, Ravens, Jags (who will prove to be nothing without Brunell), and the Pats as better then us?
ublinkwescore
10-16-2002, 10:53 AM
The pats three game losing streak should put them just below us.
WCoastFin
10-16-2002, 02:32 PM
#1 spot I totallly agree....I can live with the rest clump....good job! Your finally putting them were they belong. ;)