Tweet
there are rumors that he'll be cut, I don't really pay attention to Philly is he any good
:push:
:push:
-
lets go BUFFALO lets go BUFFALO -
Hell NO!!!! -
If the eagles are cutting a WR, he must REALLY suck...
The eagles had a trio of the worst WR's in the league.
Did you see them drop all of those passes in the playoffs?Comment
-
oh god he sucks!Comment
-
he was terrible. just plain terrible. I wouldn't even want him for our 5th or 6th receiver.Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"Comment
-
He wasnt that bad just not a number one, put him in as 2 or 3 he will get you numbers they wont be you know peerless price numbers couple years back but they will be good numbers. also can do kick returns. if we could get him cheap id take him.
MUCK
FIAMIComment
-
As a deep threat he's not bad. He's fast but drops a lot of passes. It'll be just like having Peerless back! Seriously, I don't think he'd be a bad pickup but he's not that big and he does have the dropsies. He may be able to stretch the field though.Comment
-
he would be a good complimentary deep threat."All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie HoweComment
-
in that case, why don't we call up james jett and get him back in here. (if you want a cheap fast guy who can't catch)Originally posted by TedMock
As a deep threat he's not bad. He's fast but drops a lot of passes. It'll be just like having Peerless back! Seriously, I don't think he'd be a bad pickup but he's not that big and he does have the dropsies. He may be able to stretch the field though.Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"Comment
-
Didn't we attempt to bring him in at one point? Besides, I never said I wanted Thrash! I was just trying to weigh it out. I think he'd be better than most in certain capacities. Maybe as a 3rd or 4th option.Originally posted by IHateTheDullphins
in that case, why don't we call up james jett and get him back in here. (if you want a cheap fast guy who can't catch)Last edited by TedMock; 03-17-2004, 02:54 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by IHateTheDullphins
in that case, why don't we call up james jett and get him back in here. (if you want a cheap fast guy who can't catch)
he is better than james jett ever was.. he was good enough to bet the number one receiver on a team that got to the nfc championship game for the last 3 years..
he is not great.. but if he was a number 3/4.. he would be way above what most have in that spot."All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie HoweComment
-
Originally posted by TedMock
Didn't we attempt to bring him in at one point? Besides, I never said I wanted Thrash! I was just trying to weigh it out.
yeah, I was just being sarcastic. I hate Thrash, along with the dullphins.Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"Comment
-
He was a complete bust in Washington. He's too small to be the number one WR. As a 3rd or 4th with the extra DB playing off, he may be okay.Originally posted by IHateTheDullphins
yeah, I was just being sarcastic. I hate Thrash, along with the dullphins.Comment
-
i agree.he would be a nice addition to any team.Originally posted by Tatonka
he is not great.. but if he was a number 3/4.. he would be way above what most have in that spot.Originally posted by yordad
Comment
-
He is an option if released but I think we should pick up Alex Bannister from Seattle good special teamer plus offers up some size.Comment
Comment