If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
he was terrible. just plain terrible. I wouldn't even want him for our 5th or 6th receiver.
Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"
He wasnt that bad just not a number one, put him in as 2 or 3 he will get you numbers they wont be you know peerless price numbers couple years back but they will be good numbers. also can do kick returns. if we could get him cheap id take him.
As a deep threat he's not bad. He's fast but drops a lot of passes. It'll be just like having Peerless back! Seriously, I don't think he'd be a bad pickup but he's not that big and he does have the dropsies. He may be able to stretch the field though.
Originally posted by TedMock As a deep threat he's not bad. He's fast but drops a lot of passes. It'll be just like having Peerless back! Seriously, I don't think he'd be a bad pickup but he's not that big and he does have the dropsies. He may be able to stretch the field though.
in that case, why don't we call up james jett and get him back in here. (if you want a cheap fast guy who can't catch)
Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"
in that case, why don't we call up james jett and get him back in here. (if you want a cheap fast guy who can't catch)
Didn't we attempt to bring him in at one point? Besides, I never said I wanted Thrash! I was just trying to weigh it out. I think he'd be better than most in certain capacities. Maybe as a 3rd or 4th option.
Originally posted by IHateTheDullphins in that case, why don't we call up james jett and get him back in here. (if you want a cheap fast guy who can't catch)
he is better than james jett ever was.. he was good enough to bet the number one receiver on a team that got to the nfc championship game for the last 3 years..
he is not great.. but if he was a number 3/4.. he would be way above what most have in that spot.
"All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Didn't we attempt to bring him in at one point? Besides, I never said I wanted Thrash! I was just trying to weigh it out.
yeah, I was just being sarcastic. I hate Thrash, along with the dullphins.
Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"
Comment