PDA

View Full Version : Who's the better reciever?



Dolfan984
03-19-2004, 01:21 AM
Sorry I just wanted some Bills fans point of view.

BoltzFan
03-19-2004, 05:25 AM
Boston.

Oh wait, you said Bills fans:ontome:

Lefty2985
03-19-2004, 05:27 AM
chambers.. He doesn't have a bad time attitude

Tatonka
03-19-2004, 07:28 AM
if your talking about physical talent.. boston.

if you talking whole package/bagage .. chambers

if your talking ugliest.. chambers.. :D

chambers looks like a crack junkie in the face with those buldged out eyes

i think that they will both end up with about 800 yards.

Tatonka
03-19-2004, 07:30 AM
but i think mcmichael and thompsen will have a significant share of yards too..

Demon
03-19-2004, 08:15 AM
I think Chambers is better. I think Chambers has Randy Moss type skills but he doesn't play in the offensive system Moss does and doesn't have a QB with the arm that Moss always had. Boston is good too, but not better then Chambers IMO.

Patrick76777
03-19-2004, 08:17 AM
I was impressed with Chambers last year! Plus you know what your getting!

John Doe
03-19-2004, 11:13 AM
Does anyone really think that any team would let Chambers go for a back-up corner and a late round draft pick?

socalfan
03-19-2004, 01:20 PM
chambers

Dolfan984
03-19-2004, 03:30 PM
Thanks guys. I am in agreement with you all. :)

Forward_Lateral
03-20-2004, 09:58 AM
I think with AJ Feely at QB, it doesn't matter who's better, they'll both get about 600 yards. If I was a fins fan, I'd rather have Fiedler as my QB than Feely. JMO.

TigerJ
03-20-2004, 10:02 AM
Boston has more physical talent. Chambers will be more productive.

DraftBoy
03-20-2004, 10:22 AM
Chambers he'll be more consistent and less of a distraction in the media

PhinPhreak
03-20-2004, 10:38 AM
I say Moulds, oh know what did I start :D.

bernielivsey_1
03-20-2004, 10:39 AM
McKnight and Ward

PhinPhreak
03-20-2004, 10:41 AM
Truthfully it is hard to say, we need to see what Boston does in the Miami Offense.

It's always hard to compare players that come from different systems and different level of teams. Boston has played for crappy teams where he was the only decent WR. Will he be better now that he has another threat on the other side?

Will he leave his baggage in SD? I think it's way too early to tell.

tampabay25690
03-20-2004, 10:48 AM
Didn't he ask who the better WR is..................With out a doubt it is David Boston, I know he has a ****ty attitude but when he is healty he is by far one of the 3 best WR's in the NFL........

If he came to Buffalo, we would all be very happy Bills fans if he was healthy all year round!!!!!!

pyrrhonist
03-20-2004, 10:59 AM
Boston is obviously the better athletically-talented WR. However, ever since he started bulking up with his body-building, he's been nothing but an injury case. He has put up respectable numbers when healthy, though, even though he's played for offensively "challenged" teams.

McBFLO
03-20-2004, 11:00 AM
Boston has all the physical tools to be an excellent WR, but he's an idiot. Chambers is a nice WR, but I think Boston has more upside. If he were to straighten out his act. He could be extremely dangerous. He's a freak! 240 lbs and runs a 4.3 40? wow!

Halbert
03-20-2004, 11:19 AM
If I had to choose just one to start opposite Moulds I'd take Chambers. Boston is dominant when he's one, but he hadn't been consistent since '01 (1600 yds!!) and can't stay on the field.

btw - Feeley is a huuuuge risk for a team whose biggest barrier to a deep playoff run appears to be in their head. But if they manage to fix the OL and if Boston can suddenly turn sane, Feeley could end up looking great. I think the OL is going to sabotage their season, though. Too many holes and not enough money to fix it.