If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
If we could get Blake real cheap, I'd take him in a heartbeat as long as it meant cutting Blew and drafting a QB. He wouldn't be my first choice, but if we're looking for a QB to primarily be a Delhomme, and if we're looking to the draft as being the answer for the future, then I don't see why not Blake. May as well.
If it means bringing him in as a #2 however, then I don't think we need him. May as well make our rookie QB the #2 and have him come in to get a few games under his belt for the '05 season.
Bottom line is that unless we are going to bring in a legitimate #1, it doesn't matter. Our season will be over anyway.
I don't think Blake would help us. He's got a really strong arm but do we have the WR's that can go deep? Besides Moulds oviously. Reed is unproven, Aiken is a short gain WR and Shaw is nothign special either.
And if we're going to get someone with Blake's age, we might as well get someone with playoff expierence.
If all the qb's in the league were on a plane, (except Blake) and it blew up, I may consider bringing him in. maybe.
Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"
Blake has a big arm and experience. I'd bring him in as a backup if he would come cheap, but we would still have to take a QB in round 1 or 2.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Just because we sign him as a back-up that doesnt mean we cant still draft a rook for the future. I want someone to be able to come in this year to spell an ineffective Drew if ness. Were gonna address the speed at reciever before next season so Blakes arm strength shouldnt be an issue.
Originally posted by bernielivsey_1 Just because we sign him as a back-up that doesnt mean we cant still draft a rook for the future. I want someone to be able to come in this year to spell an ineffective Drew if ness. Were gonna address the speed at reciever before next season so Blakes arm strength shouldnt be an issue.
well, I would thingkthat Blake would be the last possible option, and the Bills by no means have reached that point yet. Blake sucks. there are plenty more qb's out there that I would take before we settle for that garbage.
Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"
I've honestly heard nothing of these locker room cancer tales myself. I've seen a little bit of his play over the years and think he'd be better than Volek and could compete with Drew for the #1 job.
Tweet
In Marv We Trust 
The Past Is Now The Future 
Comment