thrash talks heating up

[bills_7]

if we can get thrash it would give us the depth we need a WR and he may be able to show signs of what price did.... that is if he can hang on to the ball

http://www.billsdaily.com/news/index.shtml#032504

any thoughts?

[STAMPY]

i'll take the trash man

[STAMPY]

i rather have conway tho

[The Natrix]

I would be for it. Although on the downside of his carrer, Trash would most likely make more of an impact than a rookie, even a first rounder. Besides, it is to early to draft Mould's replacement. Put it off a year or two.

[Tatonka]

thrash would be the ideal speed guy.. but i personally would rather see bannister.. he would be cheaper and is much younger.

[LtBillsFan66]

I'd love Thrash!

Would he replace Reed or Shaw? Time will tell of course, but based on last season, I would say Reed.

[Tatonka]

i dont think that thrash would replace reed or shaw.. at best he would fight with shaw for the 3rd wr spot.. and come in as the flanker on 3 wr sets, letting reed move to the slot.

[The Natrix]

Originally posted by billsfanone
I'd love Thrash!

Would he replace Reed or Shaw? Time will tell of course, but based on last season, I would say Reed.

Well, I think Reed is great in the slot, so I don't see anyway Reed would move to #4.

[bills_7]

i rather see shaw in the slot he played better last yr then reed did the yr before

[The Natrix]

Originally posted by bills_7
i rather see shaw in the slot he played better last yr then reed did the yr before

Well, I'm not saying Shaw is #4 either. I think Trash and Shaw could be interchangable at the #2 depending on the play since they are different types of receivers. I like Shaw.


Not sure why some people feel it is critical to draft a WR early. I like the Bills WR group. I think they are the ones on offense who deserve all the excuses.

[The Spaz]

People are through with Reed huh, unbelievable.

[Devin]

Agree with T.

Id take Bannister first, amazing speed, pro bowl return man, great young deep threat....and way cheap.

[Devin]

Moulds, Bannister, Reed, Shaw sounds good to me.

[The Natrix]

Originally posted by The Spaz
People are through with Reed huh, unbelievable.

I'm not!

I just don't think it is a lock he will be great, that's all. He could. Who knows?

Hopefully Moulds will be 100% and then I see Reed, Shaw, and Trash all contributing about equally, maybe Reed a little more than the other two.

I also think getting Trash would be nice because it wouldn't close the door on Cloeman and Aiken. Bannister would. I would hate to see one of those young guys thrive for another team, especially one in the AFC east.

Anyway, get Thrash and CUT ANTONIO BROWN.

[Philly Zoner]

DO NOT DO THIS.....please listen to a voice of reason from Philadelphia. I've seen a lot of James Thrash, and I PROMISE YOU that he will not beat out Josh Reed for #2. he may look fast on paper, but he NEVER gets open.

Like Tatonka said, Bannister is by far the better choice for a depth receiver. He's probably a better receiver than Thrash (though stuck behind Seattle's stars) AND will really jazz up the ST.

don't sign Thrash... I'd rather have an unproven rookie