If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Everyone knew it was a 50/50 shot to begin with. Don't follow the suprise in your post about wasting a pick, not like there was anyone available at that time who would of made a difference on a 6 and 10 team anyway.
The Bills aren't going to trade Henry anyway. It was probably some Bills fan that came up with the #2 pick in the draft for TH. They have a solid running back to start and a potential stud as a backup. Both have good cap numbers and the team will have to see how the season plays out. After this season if both players show they are as good as advertised the team will look to move them next year.
Originally posted by The_Philster exactly...which is why it's to even suggest we trade away our offensive MVP
That's also why some people say it is to draft a Quarterback in the 1st round that won't see the field this year and has the "potential" to be a great QB, but will cost a ton of money and will not have ANY immediate impact. a QB in the first round is a gamble, just like McGahee is. Why do it?
That's also why some people say it is to draft a Quarterback in the 1st round that won't see the field this year and has the "potential" to be a great QB, but will cost a ton of money and will not have ANY immediate impact. a QB in the first round is a gamble, just like McGahee is. Why do it?
Because sometimes you just have to take a risk in order to obtain something of value. Personally, I don't know who we should draft, but I am willing to gamble on greatness every once and a while - not everytime mind you - but sometimes it makes sense.
Originally posted by Mikey82 That's also why some people say it is to draft a Quarterback in the 1st round that won't see the field this year and has the "potential" to be a great QB, but will cost a ton of money and will not have ANY immediate impact. a QB in the first round is a gamble, just like McGahee is. Why do it?
Refresh my memory...what happened the last time we selected a QB in the first round?
I'm glad to see that many of us think that trading TH at this point would be pure, unadulterated LUNACY.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment