Tweet
At the NFL owners meeting they approved instant replay for another 5 seasons adding an amendment stating that if a team is succesful on their first 2 replay challenges they will be awarded a third.
-
Originally posted by paladin warrior -
only if they are successful...eitherwise
For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding. -
Like I said before if you keep challenging and you get them correct you shuldn't be penalized by losing them.
Comment
-
Exactly, that is what they implemented if you get the first to correct then you get a third.Originally posted by The Spaz
Like I said before if you keep challenging and you get them correct you shuldn't be penalized by losing them.Originally posted by paladin warriorComment
-
That still wouldn't have helped GW.Someone said "What's he gonna turn out like?" Ha!
And someone else said "Never mind!"
-Deep Purple
"Have you ever taken a crap so big your pants fit better?"--Ron WhiteComment
-
Im glad they reupped Instant Reply its helped the game alot.COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.LecterComment
-
I agree with The Spaz, and that doesn't sound like what they did. They only offered one conditional challenge. If a coaching staff is really sharp and always challenges in the right situation, why shouldn't they be able to make four or five or more challenges? Practically speaking, they might never get that many reasons to challenge in a half, but what would improve the officiating more than to give coaches the possibility of chalenging every screwy call as long as coaches are responsible in doing it.I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.Comment
-
Originally posted by TigerJ
I agree with The Spaz, and that doesn't sound like what they did. They only offered one conditional challenge. If a coaching staff is really sharp and always challenges in the right situation, why shouldn't they be able to make four or five or more challenges? Practically speaking, they might never get that many reasons to challenge in a half, but what would improve the officiating more than to give coaches the possibility of chalenging every screwy call as long as coaches are responsible in doing it.
Comment
-
Yeah, a third challenge never would have been a possibility. I don't think he got 2 right all year!Originally posted by helmetguy
That still wouldn't have helped GW.Buffalo Only and Always.Comment
-
What they need to do is re-evaluate what you can challenge. Screw that after the whistle crap. Most of the bad calls are "unchallengeable"******************************************
If you don't like your job, you don't strike; you just go in every day and do it really half assed. That's the American way. - Homer Simpson
"In the poker game of life, women are the rake. They are the f**kin' rake."Comment
Comment