Kordell a Reciver?

[Bled2Hen]

It has been said by Mike Mularky, that former Steeler QB Kordell Stewart would be used as a Reciver, or even a running back, if he was to sign with the bills. He said he would play every single game in 2004 if he was to sign. Coach Mularky doesnt want Kordell to sign with the team to compete with D-Bled. He just wants an expierienced back up QB just in case anything happenes to Drew.

I say sign him. He is quick, Im not sure if he has hands, but its not like we are going to use him 35 plays out of the whole game. I also like this because it could open up some trick plays for us. Maybe Bledsoe drops back, pithces it to Kordell, and Kordell throws the ball to Moulds or whoever. I am for this, I think it could work, How about you guys?

[Mr. Cynical]

Sign Kordell. Cut Drew.

That's what I think.

[The Spaz]

Where did you here this link?

[The Spaz]

Originally posted by kal123
Sign Kordell. Cut Drew.

That's what I think.

I think if you think that then you have problems.

[saviorbledsoe]

I would love to see some trickery in the playcalling. Imagine the possibilities already with Mcgahee and Henry lined up in the backfield............now we put Kordel out there as a receiver but wait ,,,,,,,,,,,is it a run, a pass, a screen, a reverse............no its a pitch back from Drew to Kordel...........is he going to run, pass,............endless opportunities on offense!

[Buffatexas]

I am so with savior on that one...that would definitely change things if we could pull it off

[Bled2Hen]

http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20040331/2003532.asp

there is the link.

[The Spaz]

Originally posted by Bled2Hen
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial...31/2003532.asp

there is the link.

Ok cool. Thanks.

[mightyspaz]

Haha .. i just posted it from another site .. lol

http://www.billsdaily.com/news/index.shtml

[Bled2Hen]

by the way, kal, get off the bong and the crack, because if you think that Kordell is better than Drew, ha, you must be on something.

[helmetguy]

Stewart was initially drafted as a QB, but was listed as a WR when he made the final roster. It was a little loophole Pittsburgh used in order to carry a fourth QB on their 53-man roster.

[Tatonka]

Originally posted by kal123
Sign Kordell. Cut Drew.

That's what I think.

i thought you said you were going to let it rest a while? what was that.. 3 hours?

Originally posted by saviorbledsoe
I would love to see some trickery in the playcalling. Imagine the possibilities already with Mcgahee and Henry lined up in the backfield............now we put Kordel out there as a receiver but wait ,,,,,,,,,,,is it a run, a pass, a screen, a reverse............no its a pitch back from Drew to Kordel...........is he going to run, pass,............endless opportunities on offense!

wow.. we agree on something.

dont worry.. if you watched any of pitts offense.. you know that they loved to throw in trick plays.. you will see plenty this year.

[The Spaz]

Originally posted by Tatonka


i thought you said you were going to let it rest a while? what was that.. 3 hours?



wow.. we agree on something.

dont worry.. if you watched any of pitts offense.. you know that they loved to throw in trick plays.. you will see plenty this year.

You will also see the trick plays used at the proper times not at the goalline etc.

[Mr. Cynical]

Originally posted by Bled2Hen
by the way, kal, get off the bong and the crack, because if you think that Kordell is better than Drew, ha, you must be on something.

Gee, this coming from a guy named "Bled2Hen". What a shocker.

[Mr. Cynical]

Originally posted by The Spaz


I think if you think that then you have problems.

Good for you!