Tweet
Just for fun. Lets say you had your choice between Roy Williams or Mike Williams. They seem very similar to me. Which one is better? Which one would you take?
-
-
neither.. because they wont make an impact for 2 more years.
"All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe -
Roy.... i don't want Keyshawn 2Comment
-
Roy - seems to have more speed. Mike may be more of a possession guy, which we already have in Reed, Shaw, and Aiken.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment
-
I don;t know too much about mike, but just hearing Roy compared to Moulds makes me want him instead. But I'm against taking a WR in the first."It's not whether you win or lose; it's how you play the game."-Vince LombardiComment
-
I say Mike. Added height will help to get those jump balls. Should be able to come down with any ball over the smaller CBs.Comment
-
Roy, has the effect of the loss of PP's speed on our offense been lost on all of you?Comment
-
No WR in the first round. They will not make an impact for at least a few years......I would go with Mike though if they were avaialbe in the 2nd though.
Ryan Withey
Owner/President/GM/Director of Player Personnel
Kansas City Super Deuces
Comment
-
While that is true sometimes it's not always the case.Originally posted by ryjam282
No WR in the first round. They will not make an impact for at least a few years......I would go with Mike though if they were avaialbe in the 2nd though.
Comment
-
Anquan Boldin, Randy Moss, Santana Moss, Charlie Rogers all made major impacts within their first two years if not in thier first year and those are just names off the top of my head. Like Spaz says some WR dont take that much development time.COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.LecterComment
-
Andre Johnson too.Originally posted by DraftBoy
Anquan Boldin, Randy Moss, Santana Moss, Charlie Rogers all made major impacts within their first two years if not in thier first year and those are just names off the top of my head. Like Spaz says some WR dont take that much development time.
Last edited by The Spaz; 04-06-2004, 12:23 PM.Comment
-
THrow in that WR on texans i forgot his nameComment
-
mike williams is better then roy williams but roy fits are needs better due to his speedComment
-
FEW and FAR between.Originally posted by DraftBoy
Anquan Boldin, Randy Moss, Santana Moss, Charlie Rogers all made major impacts within their first two years if not in thier first year and those are just names off the top of my head. Like Spaz says some WR dont take that much development time.
And while they made an impact by having solid years, the impact wasnt felt much until a season or two later.
WR take time period. And while we need one, dont say "take someone who can make an impact this year" and select a WR....aint happening. Just dont base that as your argument.
Anyway that being said...Roy.Comment
-
Santana Moss was hurt and had only a total of 40 yards receiving in 5 games.... NOT a major impact his first year. He only had 433 yards receiving his second year... I wouldn't call that a major impact.Originally posted by DraftBoy
Anquan Boldin, Randy Moss, Santana Moss, Charlie Rogers all made major impacts within their first two years if not in thier first year and those are just names off the top of my head. Like Spaz says some WR dont take that much development time.
Comment
Comment