PDA

View Full Version : nfl.com Pat Kirwan Mock Draft



BillsRockSOMUCH
04-08-2004, 10:55 AM
Here's the mock-

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/7232005

13. BUFFALO -- ROY WILLIAMS, WR. The Bills will be ecstatic if Roy is still on the board. He answers the wide receiver issue from last year when Peerless Price left. Drew Bledsoe will be a better player overnight with this player on the field.

I like.. I like

Jan Reimers
04-08-2004, 11:02 AM
I like Roy much better than either Reggie or Mike.

Tatonka
04-08-2004, 11:03 AM
me too. roy is the best williams.

Tatonka
04-08-2004, 11:05 AM
wow.. he has sean taylor at #12.. and rivers #25 to greenbay.

if taylor falls to 11.. you move up to go get him.

The Spaz
04-08-2004, 11:05 AM
Originally posted by Tatonka
me too. roy is the best williams.

What did you say? I mean I agree but you're always saying he drops too many balls which he may drop some but it can't be that many just look at his production it's pretty damn good.

lordofgun
04-08-2004, 11:05 AM
OVER-RATED

BillsRockSOMUCH
04-08-2004, 11:05 AM
Mike is just a posession WR.

DraftBoy
04-08-2004, 11:06 AM
Originally posted by The Spaz


What did you say? I mean I agree but you're always saying he drops too many balls which he may drop some but it can't be that many just look at his production it's pretty damn good.

I agree that I couldnt believe T said that too, but of all the Williams, Roy is by far the best.

Tatonka
04-08-2004, 11:06 AM
Originally posted by The Spaz
What did you say? I mean I agree but you're always saying he drops too many balls which he may drop some but it can't be that many just look at his production it's pretty damn good.

i dont want any of the three, but roy williams is the best of the three.

that is all i ment.

Dantheman1280
04-08-2004, 11:10 AM
I think roy is a little over rated, but at 13 he would be a solid pick!

LABillsFan
04-08-2004, 10:45 PM
Not that this means anything, but I just heard an interview with him on the radio about an hour ago and he said Cleveland may be willing to trade their pick to a team wanting to jump ahead of Pittsburgh to land a QB. He wouldn't say what they would want in return though.

Novacane
04-08-2004, 11:11 PM
I would be very suprised if Oakland took Roethlisberger. Also Detroit should really try and trade down if they want steven jackson. I don't think he is worth a top 10 pick

cordog
04-09-2004, 09:12 AM
Originally posted by BillsRockSOMUCH
Mike is just a posession WR.

A posession reciever that runs a 4.45 40??????

Patrick76777
04-09-2004, 09:20 AM
Well I watched SC today and Kiper did a thing about the WR's! I knew it was a deep WR draft but I didn't know it was this deep. Kiper thinks up to 8 could go in the first round!!!!!

If that's the case and it's so deep, why take one in the first round? Are those top 3 that much better than the rest? And is it a sure thing that they'll be better than the rest in the NFL?

My thinking is, if there are so many good WR's why not wait until the 2nd round when there is a very good chance you can still get a very good one?

That frees up the first round for another position!

Just a thought

Tatonka
04-09-2004, 09:40 AM
Originally posted by cordog
A posession reciever that runs a 4.45 40??????

he doesnt run a 4.45.. mike williams ran a 4.56 w/ the wind and a 4.62 against it.


Originally posted by Patrick76777
Well I watched SC today and Kiper did a thing about the WR's! I knew it was a deep WR draft but I didn't know it was this deep. Kiper thinks up to 8 could go in the first round!!!!!

If that's the case and it's so deep, why take one in the first round? Are those top 3 that much better than the rest? And is it a sure thing that they'll be better than the rest in the NFL?

My thinking is, if there are so many good WR's why not wait until the 2nd round when there is a very good chance you can still get a very good one?

That frees up the first round for another position!

Just a thought

i so agree with this.

Patrick76777
04-09-2004, 09:44 AM
Originally posted by Tatonka


he doesnt run a 4.45.. mike williams ran a 4.56 w/ the wind and a 4.62 against it.



i so agree with this.


How fast was the wind blowing?


and Cool!

ryjam282
04-09-2004, 09:55 AM
No thanks...Don't need a WR but thanks.

cordog
04-09-2004, 10:15 AM
Originally posted by Tatonka
he doesnt run a 4.45.. mike williams ran a 4.56 w/ the wind and a 4.62 against it.



i so agree with this.

Not according to espn, its been on sportscenter and espnnews that he ran a 4.45 with the wind and a 4.53 agianst it. Someone did say that the wind was blowing up to 25 mph yesterday.