Is this draft as deep as we are being told?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • THATHURMANATOR
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 69112
    #1

    Is this draft as deep as we are being told?

    Is this years draft really that deep? It seems like we are getting a little overhyped here.

    Yes WR are very, very deep, but after that I don't see to many positions that are that deep.

    QB-3 studs and a couple prospects
    rb-2 solid backs and a few others with talent
    te- they say this may be the weakest TE draft ever
    de-2 solid ends
    dt-2 or 3 solid dts
    cb-no studs really
    safety-one stud and a couple prospects

    That is a reason why I wouldn't mind giving up say a 3rd to move up and get rothesburger.
    Tags: None
  • Gonk
    Registered User
    • Apr 2003
    • 32
    #2
    Chris Gamble and DeAngelo Hall are studs.

    SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP!

    Comment

    • The Spaz
      Registered User
      • Mar 2003
      • 19066
      #3
      O-line is the weakest position in this draft.

      Comment

      • THATHURMANATOR
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 69112
        #4
        Originally posted by Gonk
        Chris Gamble and DeAngelo Hall are studs.
        They are?

        I have seen Gamble rated as the 3rd cb on a couple draft boards.

        Comment

        • THATHURMANATOR
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 69112
          #5
          Originally posted by The Spaz
          O-line is the weakest position in this draft.
          Besides TE you may be right!

          Comment

          • BillsRockSOMUCH
            Exhausted of Losing
            • Mar 2004
            • 909
            #6
            Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR


            Besides TE you may be right!
            TE isn't that weak.

            I see 3 1st round talents at TE in Winslow, Troupe, and Watson.

            Comment

            • mypoorfriendme
              Registered User
              • Apr 2003
              • 1486
              #7
              a "deep" draft doesnt mean it has a ton of guys worthy of picking in the first round, it means that in the second third and fourth roudns, youll be able to find plenty of talent.

              depth isnt measured in the top halfof the draft, its measured in the bottom half
              the dude abides

              Comment

              • TigerJ
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 22575
                #8
                Dunta Robinson has moved ahead of Gamble on a lot of boards. There are never drafts that are super deep across the board. All of them have strengths and weaknesses. Obviously the strength of the 2004 draft is WR. I think the draft is pretty deep at DT too. Few studs, but a lot of guys who might develop in the NFL. Igor Olshansky anyone?
                I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                Comment

                • SoCalBillsFan
                  Expert on Experts
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 2879
                  #9
                  Gamble isn that good, he gets hype because he played both ways.

                  Comment

                  • The Spaz
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 19066
                    #10
                    Originally posted by TigerJ
                    Dunta Robinson has moved ahead of Gamble on a lot of boards. There are never drafts that are super deep across the board. All of them have strengths and weaknesses. Obviously the strength of the 2004 draft is WR. I think the draft is pretty deep at DT too. Few studs, but a lot of guys who might develop in the NFL. Igor Olshansky anyone?
                    Igor could be good or he could be Leif Larsen.

                    Comment

                    • B-DON
                      hi
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 1985
                      #11
                      Originally posted by mypoorfriendme
                      a "deep" draft doesnt mean it has a ton of guys worthy of picking in the first round, it means that in the second third and fourth roudns, youll be able to find plenty of talent.

                      depth isnt measured in the top halfof the draft, its measured in the bottom half
                      Obviously if there are alot of people that could be chosen in the first round forcing players to fall back to later rounds meaning this is a DEEP draft

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X