Throne Logic
04-25-2004, 01:29 AM
Again, I'm not judging the talent they chose. I'm annoyed with what they gave up to get that talent. I feel it could have been managed much muchbetter.
For Example, here's what I would have done:
Trade the #13 to move down to the low 20's and pick up more picks. Let's assume we get only a 2005 #2 as part of that package (This is borderline rediculous because a 2005 #1 plus a pick or two this year's draft was the going rate for teams to move up).
Draft Losman with that new low 20's pick, like they did anyway.
Draft Grove with the first #2 pick.
Draft Tim Anderson with the #3 pick.
Use the 2005 #1 to draft Mike Williams in the supplimental draft.
This gets us pretty much the same results, with an upgrade at WR (Mike Williams over Evans). Plus we'd have another pick this year and another pick in next year's second round.
Tell me what team would have turned down this trade?
In reality, we could have probably gotten at least a 2005 #1 pick for compensation from another team to move up 8-10 spots to the #13 overall this year.
For Example, here's what I would have done:
Trade the #13 to move down to the low 20's and pick up more picks. Let's assume we get only a 2005 #2 as part of that package (This is borderline rediculous because a 2005 #1 plus a pick or two this year's draft was the going rate for teams to move up).
Draft Losman with that new low 20's pick, like they did anyway.
Draft Grove with the first #2 pick.
Draft Tim Anderson with the #3 pick.
Use the 2005 #1 to draft Mike Williams in the supplimental draft.
This gets us pretty much the same results, with an upgrade at WR (Mike Williams over Evans). Plus we'd have another pick this year and another pick in next year's second round.
Tell me what team would have turned down this trade?
In reality, we could have probably gotten at least a 2005 #1 pick for compensation from another team to move up 8-10 spots to the #13 overall this year.