There has been a lot of talk recently on local and national radio shows regarding Brain types and how certain Brain types cannot succeed in the NFL. Has anyone heard this also. The guy who was talking about it on the radio said that there is one QB in this class who has the bad brain type and then when someone asked him to talk about Losman he would not.
Brain types
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
There has been a lot of talk recently on local and national radio shows regarding Brain types and how certain Brain types cannot succeed in the NFL. Has anyone heard this also. The guy who was talking about it on the radio said that there is one QB in this class who has the bad brain type and then when someone asked him to talk about Losman he would not.
From what I have read Eli Manning has a bad brain type.
-
-
Did he check Losman? http://www.indystar.com/articles/2/143771-3762-038.html The Brain Doctor has examined the New York Giants' new quarterback. The prognosis: Eli Manning may become a good quarterback, make a Pro Bowl or two, but greatness will elude him, because his brain isn't wired like his brother Peyton's.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Spaz
From what I have read Eli Manning has a bad brain type.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment
-
-
Colin Cowherd of ESPN radio gave this a lot of play, and interviewed the guy from braintypes.com. He was asked about Losman. he did not specifically refuse to talk about him but just kind of passed over the subject. It's not clear if he just forgot the question or was deliberately avoiding discussing Losman.
Manning (Eli) is not considered to have the worst braintype for a QB by far. He just doesn't have the best like his older brother. The braintypes guy doesn't necessarily think he'll be a failure, as he predicted for Leaf, just that he won't be as successful as Peyton.
A reminder: braintyping is based on the psychological theory of Karl Jung. The standard test for typing is the Meyers-Briggs Type Analysis. It was developed in the first half of the twentieth century. It has proven to have validity for a lot of applications. As time has gone on, certainly there are people who have figured out how to cheat, that is to manipulate the results, based on how they answer certain questions. As this gets more exposure, my guess is that it will be less reliable in the future because agents are bound to get a hold of the test and start coaching clients on what answers to give.I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by billsfanone
Oh yeah. I hear of that before. I think it's a bunch of bs.
"Creativity is more important than Intelligence."
Comment
-
Comment