If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Name your top Fantasy football "sleeper" for this year.
Name your top Fantasy football "sleeper" for this year.
I think Justin McCareins could have a very big year for the Jets. I haven't really thought about this much, but he's the guy that jumps in my head almost immediately. Your thoughts?
Originally posted by The Spaz You think Grossman will be good EE?
They're putting in that St. Louis / KC offense.
Grossman is one of those guys who may not have the combine stats or measurement, but he looks like a winner to me. Getting rid of that John Schoop fiasco will help him out.
Originally posted by Earthquake Enyart They're putting in that St. Louis / KC offense.
Grossman is one of those guys who may not have the combine stats or measurement, but he looks like a winner to me. Getting rid of that John Schoop fiasco will help him out.
Interesting. I didn't think the Bears have the weapons to use that type of offense. I guess we'll see.
The only reason I'm not sure about Dillon is that I'm not sure how the Pats will use him. They had that Raider-esque short passing attack last year, but that's because they didn;t have a feature back as another option. Now, that they have one, it'll be interesting to see what they'll do.
Comment