If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Williams hasn't been great yet but decent.
Reed had a strong rookie year but took a step back last year but he is still a contributor
Denney blows
Wire is a possible starter
Bannan is a decent backup
Thomas is a decent reserve
Pucillo blows but what do you expect from a 7th rounder.
And he started as a 7th rounder! Not a lot of guys do that.
If this is the worst draft in history- then your draft history is only hte past 4 years. 2000 was way worse than that- and there were a lot worse ones before that as well!
i will say this.. if mike williams continues this crybaby bull****, pissing and moaning about his emotional issues.. and then doesnt play well this year.. he is a bust..
and willis better be something ****ing special too..
under TDs watch -
1. clements - decent 1st rounder.. i wouldnt call him dominant.. but he is very good and i have no regrets about this pick
2. williams - underperformer up to this point, and now he is on the rag during training camp and no one seems to be able to find a tampon big enough for his fat 380 pound ass.
3. Bledsoe - he sucks.. but we knew that before we wasted a first on him
4. willis mcgahee - totally unknown, and not really needed w/ henry here, which we spent a 2nd round pick on.
5. evans - unknown.. like most receivers that need 3 years to develope.. we probably wont know for a while
6. losman - unknown.. like most rookie qbs.. we wont know for a while..
it would be so cool if we could actually get a good first round pick that came in and was awesome right away.. but other than clements.. we just cant get that.
"All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Originally posted by _Ghost_Hackers Reed will be good - cant blame him for a bad FIRST YEAR (look at Moulds first year)
Wire is a starter on most teams
Thomas may be good in the future
Bannan is NOT a bad backup
I wonder if Bannan makes this team?
I think Adams, Williams, Anderson, and Gibson are all pretty much locks. I don't think we're going to keep 6 DT's, so that would only leave room for 1 (at most) of Edwards and Bannan.
I think Wire is a solid backup, but I don't think he'd be a starter on most teams. I think if you're a contender and Wire is your SS, you're looking to upgrade - about the same as if you were a contender and had Antowain Smith as your RB.
Thomas ... at this stage he's about what you'd expect - he might be a nickle CB, he might not.
We got some usefulness out of our late picks, but nothing like a David Givens or anything.
For a team picking 4th in each round, this was not a strong draft. However, there is still time.
Comment