PDA

View Full Version : Offensive Rookie of the Year


Phins054
11-07-2002, 10:28 AM
Who do you like as the OROY so far???
Novacane
11-07-2002, 12:22 PM
Portis is ahead and should walk away with it easily.
Phins054
11-07-2002, 12:28 PM
I dunno...Joey could easily walk away with it if he gets 2-3 more wins...Carr looks pretty good for a rookie on an expansion team. It always hard to outshine rookie QBs that get to play a lot because they are the focal point of a team. Clinton and Randy are having great rookie seasons, but in comparison to the QBs...it will be hard to get their type of #s...
Novacane
11-07-2002, 12:33 PM
Playing for a winning team is going to get CP a lot more exposure. Having no QB for 6 weeks is going to kill Mcmicheals chances. I have not really seen JH. He looked like crap against us. I was impressed with Carr when we played them.


I'd still bet on CP though.
Phins054
11-07-2002, 03:12 PM
good enough logic...

I still think McMichael is awesome and amazed that we were able to get him in the 4th round. I think he will something special in the future. He has the skills of a Shannon Sharpe without the ego.:up:
DraftBoy
11-07-2002, 03:31 PM
Dont forget this name Dante Stallworth
ArcticWildMan
11-07-2002, 03:56 PM
Jeremy Shockey should be on the list. He's had a huge impact for the Giants!!
shelby
11-07-2002, 07:49 PM
i agree, Arctic...Shockey deserves recognition...but he hasn't lived up to his potential due to injury.

i would have to say Harrington.
Marcos20
11-07-2002, 08:16 PM
Clinton deserves this one...
lunatic_bills_fan
11-07-2002, 08:31 PM
What about Reed :dj:
casdhf
11-07-2002, 08:36 PM
Shockey gas been extreeeemly overrated, he hasnt done squat
TigerJ
11-07-2002, 10:02 PM
I think Reed is great but I don't think he has made enough of an impact to be seriously considered. Shockey hasn't done enough either. Frankly, I don't feel qualified to make that determination. I really haven't followed any of the four in the poll closely enough to vote. I think I might lean toward Portis based on two criteria. First, Portis is one of two of the four rookies on a team with a winning record. Carr and Harrington are both in key positions and have played surprisingly well for rookies, but their teams are still losing more games than they're winning. Between Portis and McMichael, both of whom have played great, Portis seems to be the more valuable to his team. That's mostly because RB has more touches of the ball in a game and therefore plays a more critical role in the team's offence than a TE.
SABURZFAN
11-09-2002, 08:27 PM
i like how harrington has played but i think i'd go with portis.