Mularkey report card

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chernobylwraiths
    Registered User
    • Jan 2003
    • 41838

    Mularkey report card

    Kept with the run a lot better.

    Don't understand the lateral call.

    Barely noticed McGahee until Henry seemed to get hurt.

    Didn't seem to go for a home run ball at all to soften the rush up a bit.

    First and goal from the three, as a running team you bust it up the middle three or four times!

    Don't need another coach who doesn't believe in his kicker. If Lindell is given the opportunity to hit that 50 yarder and hits it, you guys aren't all saying he sucks. If you don't have any confindence in a field goal kicker to hit a 50 yarder, then you might as well just go for it on fourth down all the time. Then the punt only netted about 12 yards.

    Three man rush at the end gave Leftwich too damned much time.

    Offense looked a lot less turnover prone as a whole.
  • Đ²
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 1876

    #2
    He coached a good game, it came down to players not executing the big plays at the end (Clements, Moorman).

    Did I mention Clements sucks ?


    Ahm George W. Bush and Ah will protect America !

    Comment

    • chernobylwraiths
      Registered User
      • Jan 2003
      • 41838

      #3
      Originally posted by Đ²
      He coached a good game, it came down to players not executing the big plays at the end (Clements, Moorman).

      Did I mention Clements sucks ?
      C isn't terrible, but the not going for a field goal was a bad call IMO and not running the ball again on third and goal at the one was an incredibly bad call IMO.

      Comment

      • Crisis
        Registered User
        • Aug 2004
        • 12738

        #4
        Originally posted by chernobylwraiths
        C isn't terrible, but the not going for a field goal was a bad call IMO and not running the ball again on third and goal at the one was an incredibly bad call IMO.
        Hindsight is 20/20...The OL didnt do anything in 2 downs, why give them another shot? They got pushed back so much on those plays.
        Originally posted by LOSman WINS
        Vanek is Austrian not European
        Originally posted by Prov401
        Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
        Originally posted by better days
        I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.

        Comment

        • chernobylwraiths
          Registered User
          • Jan 2003
          • 41838

          #5
          Originally posted by Crisis
          Hindsight is 20/20...The OL didnt do anything in 2 downs, why give them another shot? They got pushed back so much on those plays.
          Do you remember it was first and goal from the 3 and 2nd and goal from the 1? They got pushed back on second down but did a decent job on first. A running team has to be able to run it to both punch it in and run out the clock. They had the second part accomplished until the penalty knocked em out.

          Comment

          • BillsNick
            Registered User
            • Jul 2003
            • 3898

            #6





            Comment

            • Historian
              2020-2023 AFC East Champions!
              • Dec 2002
              • 61721

              #7
              I give him a B.

              Good challenge.
              Good run game.
              Nice short passes.
              No manboobs.

              Comment

              • chernobylwraiths
                Registered User
                • Jan 2003
                • 41838

                #8
                Originally posted by Billsology
                I give him a B.

                Good challenge.
                Good run game.
                Nice short passes.
                No manboobs.
                I forgot about the good challenge. Freakin Tasker saying that it was a bad call. What an idiot.

                Manboobs

                Comment

                Working...
                X