The tying goal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trapezeus
    Legendary Zoner
    • Oct 2004
    • 19525

    The tying goal

    I know i was flabberghasted at the tying goal. "how could they let that go on for as long as they did without a whistle? Man those refs love buffalo!"

    but then i thought about it. There are 12 players on the ice. There were 8 of them in the crease with the clock ticking. If the sabres didn't score there, wouldn't we have been upset the other way? "Why didn't they blow the whistle and let us change the line?"

    Granted part of the answer is "because we are fickle fans."

    but honestly, i think that was BS in toronto's favor. There is no way constant jamming at the puck with that many bodies in the crease should result in a goal. That was an against the odds outcome. I'm glad it worked out, but it seemed like it was designed to just let time run off the clock until they absolutely had it.
    8
    Yes, that favored toronto is most situations
    0%
    5
    No, clearly the refs wanted the sabres to win and gave them all the chances in the world
    0%
    3

    The poll is expired.

  • SabreEleven
    Registered User
    • Aug 2002
    • 39563

    #2
    Re: The tying goal

    What does CBO mean?

    Comment

    • trapezeus
      Legendary Zoner
      • Oct 2004
      • 19525

      #3
      Re: The tying goal

      canadian biased officiating. sorry. i just assumed we all knew what that meant since it comes up every year during the playoffs.

      Comment

      • Mski
        Registered User
        • Mar 2006
        • 6753

        #4
        Re: The tying goal

        Originally posted by SabreEleven
        What does CBO mean?
        +1
        RIP Tommy D!
        12/25/1978-9/9/2008


        If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

        Comment

        • Mski
          Registered User
          • Mar 2006
          • 6753

          #5
          Re: The tying goal

          how about option C: the Ref was actually in the right position and could see the puck the whole time and wasnt biased at all
          RIP Tommy D!
          12/25/1978-9/9/2008


          If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

          Comment

          • Mski
            Registered User
            • Mar 2006
            • 6753

            #6
            Re: The tying goal

            although how there wasnt a penalty called on Komaserik >is that how you spell his name?< for his raping of Foligno was definately CBO
            RIP Tommy D!
            12/25/1978-9/9/2008


            If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

            Comment

            • jamze132
              Don’t hate…
              • Jun 2003
              • 29426

              #7
              Re: The tying goal

              If you watch the highlights on ESPN, they highlighted the puck and Leopold's stick. It showed the ref actively watching the action and the puck.

              Comment

              • trapezeus
                Legendary Zoner
                • Oct 2004
                • 19525

                #8
                Re: The tying goal

                the ref actually looked like he was in the right position. he was leaning over and i suppose he could see it. i never saw it. and i can't believe you said ESPN spent more than the time it took for the puck to get into the net on hockey highlights.

                for a league interested in protecting blows to the head, komiscerik (sp?) put in about 4-5 solid slams of folingo's head to the ice. i'm guessing shanny isn't going to give us a video and a suspension.

                Comment

                • Mski
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 6753

                  #9
                  Re: The tying goal

                  Originally posted by trapezeus
                  for a league interested in protecting blows to the head, komiscerik (sp?) put in about 4-5 solid slams of folingo's head to the ice. i'm guessing shanny isn't going to give us a video and a suspension.
                  not to mention it was clear before the puck was even dropped kosmasarik (sp?) wanted nothing to do with the play, and just to take Foligno out... and it was his whiff on a hit right off the face off that started the whole thing
                  RIP Tommy D!
                  12/25/1978-9/9/2008


                  If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

                  Comment

                  • SkateZilla
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2002
                    • 9166

                    #10
                    Re: The tying goal

                    the Ref was one of those bodies right in front of the goal, the puck was never frozen, and there was gonna be a delayed penalty on Scrivens anyway for Holding Leopold's stick. and if it would have been whistled, it would have also been a penalty on the Toronto player for covering it.


                    The fact that 2 goals went up to Toronto for review and favored Buffalo instead of toronto was funny.
                    Skate Zilla
                    -----------------------
                    Skate Zilla HD Studios:
                    SKATE ZILLA HD STUDIOS

                    Comment

                    • rbochan
                      Zamboni Driver
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 5060

                      #11
                      Re: The tying goal

                      "I think the ref was watching how many times I got punched in the face and was in awe."

                      --Marcus Foligno
                      ...Rob

                      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs;
                      it's Don't Tread On Me.

                      Comment

                      • chernobylwraiths
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 41838

                        #12
                        Re: The tying goal

                        If a Toronto player other than the goalie covers the puck in the crease, it is a penalty shot I believe.

                        Comment

                        • Mski
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 6753

                          #13
                          Re: The tying goal

                          Originally posted by chernobylwraiths
                          If a Toronto player other than the goalie covers the puck in the crease, it is a penalty shot I believe.
                          i think its situational.. if its clear the player prevented the goal, i think they just award the goal, if its not clear then its a penalty shot
                          RIP Tommy D!
                          12/25/1978-9/9/2008


                          If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

                          Comment

                          • OpIv37
                            Acid Douching Asswipe
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 101344

                            #14
                            Re: The tying goal

                            It was just a freak occurrence that worked out in our favor.

                            Usually, when that many players get involved in front of the goal, the ref loses sight of the puck. This time, we just got lucky that he was able to see it and that Toronto wasn't able to clear or cover.
                            MiKiDo Facebook
                            MiKiDo Website

                            Comment

                            • Dr. Lecter
                              Zero for Zero!
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 67946

                              #15
                              Re: The tying goal

                              Originally posted by Mski
                              i think its situational.. if its clear the player prevented the goal, i think they just award the goal, if its not clear then its a penalty shot

                              It is not situational. It is a penalty shot.

                              (iv) Falling on the puck in the goal crease

                              Originally posted by mysticsoto
                              Lecter is right in everything he said.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X