How did he look at Center? It is hard to notice from the end zone.
Tucker.
Collapse
X
-
I thought he held up well ... certainly we had no drop-off from Teague. But then again, my perspective was only from the closed end 20. I'd bet TV watchers would have better idea.what the last four years of a Republican House, Senate and Presidency has gotten us ...- tax cuts for the wealthy in the hundreds of billions
- 1,000 dead American servicemen
- the U.S. Constitution trampled upon
- our national debt growing into the TRILLIONS of dollars
- implicit lies and consistent obfuscations of the truth regarding Iraq
I can hardly wait to see what four more years will get us.
-
I wasn't there but watching JJ's highlights he seemed to hold his own, no bad snaps, he got pushed back a few times but was able to stop the rush before it got to Drew. On some of the bigger runs you can see him pushing the tackle down field at will and he seemed to come off blocks to help out the guards as wellI've said it before and I'll say it again, I don't repeat myself.
Comment
-
-
Watched the entire game on TV and Tucker looked good. It would be hard for me to give an objective evaluation on how his play compared to Teague's though due to my prior disgust with the entire o-line play up to this point, and due to rage creating my inability to distinguish or separate his play from the rest of the o-line.
In my overall opinion though Tucker looked pretty good, definitely no worse and possibly better than how Teague has looked thus far. In Teague's defense though, I've heard that he is considered the most improved lineman and I've heard that he has been over utilized in the sense that he is being asked to help other guys around him on top of his regular responsbilities. (not sure if the latter portion is true though)
To piggyback on what mypooroldfriendme stated though, the o-line looked their best by far in this game and hopefully they will continue to improve. Miami has a pretty good D, so I just hope they keep the penalties down and the protection up.
Comment
-
-
you know.. it is tough to tell how much of a factor tucker played.. but the line gave up one sack with him in there.. so **** it.. keep him in..
sure.. it could have had something to do with bledsoe playing well.. it could have had something to do with mcgahee getting yards.. all those things helped the oline look good.. but vice versa can be said as well.. the chicken or the egg..i say the egg.. whichever the hell that one is.
"All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tatonkayou know.. it is tough to tell how much of a factor tucker played.. but the line gave up one sack with him in there.. so **** it.. keep him in..
sure.. it could have had something to do with bledsoe playing well.. it could have had something to do with mcgahee getting yards.. all those things helped the oline look good.. but vice versa can be said as well.. the chicken or the egg..i say the egg.. whichever the hell that one is.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by THATHURMANATORPhil get some new material man.
Last edited by The_Philster; 10-20-2004, 06:20 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tatonkayou know.. it is tough to tell how much of a factor tucker played.. but the line gave up one sack with him in there.. so **** it.. keep him in..
Correct keep him in and keep WHATS HIS FACE on the bench ready to fill the spot. I think we had several players step it up this past week. Edwards looked SMOKING and TUCKER seemed to hold up well under the pressure.@Hemlepp53
Comment
-
Comment