If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Kelsay's no Bruce Smith but I definitely see the ability to play the Phil Hansen role- consistent, solid player who comes up with a big play from time to time. He's had 2 or 3 good games this season, including today.
Kelsay's no Bruce Smith but I definitely see the ability to play the Phil Hansen role- consistent, solid player who comes up with a big play from time to time. He's had 2 or 3 good games this season, including today.
true but part of that is because offenses are paying more attention to Shoebel now that he's put up a few sacks and forced fumbles. I don't think Kelsay's a dominant player but I do think there's a role in this defense that he can play well.
true but part of that is because offenses are paying more attention to Shoebel now that he's put up a few sacks and forced fumbles. I don't think Kelsay's a dominant player but I do think there's a role in this defense that he can play well.
Well, that's what was mentioned above. Phil Hanson complimented Bruce quite nicely, so if he is to be Schoebel's side kick, I'm happy.
I remember the BILLS saying when we drafted him that he would be the next Phil Hansen
Originally posted by Tatonka
he looked great today.. dominant on several plays.
i was happy.
Positives: Has good athleticism with above-average speed, quickness, body control and change-of-direction agility for his position … Has explosive acceleration off the snap … Plays with proper knee bend and leverage, flashing the ability to jolt the offensive linemen coming on the pass rush … Will flatten and squeeze vs. down blocks and fights pressure well on reach blocks … Shows good hand usage to keep blockers off him while maintaining separation … Aggressive hitter who will square up and wrap, bringing his hips properly to drive behind his hits … Consistently finds ways to bring the ball carriers down … Plays on his feet, using his hands effectively to protect his legs vs. low blocks … Has good back side chase quickness and a solid burst to get to the passer … Flips his hips properly and shows good rip-and-swim moves when bending the corner … Plays with all-out determination and effort … Displays good take-off quickness generating the pass rush … Adequate dropping off in pass coverage and will come off in a two-point stance in blitzing situations. http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/kelsay_chris
If Kelsay can keep developing the way he is, he'll force teams to play a straighter blocking scheme rather than sliding protection toward Schobel. That's got to help Schobel eventually.
I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
That 2003 draft is looking like a gem -- McGahee, Kelsay, McGee
I was watching Sports Xtra tonight with Ed, Adam and Stu and Ed Kilgore came up with a very good point that the BILLS should've taken Kelsay as our #1 pick in the draft and we we're lucky to get him in round #2 but then we wouldn't have gotten Willis.
i think we jump all over our young players way too quickly.
Kelsey is showing above average developement for a first day player in his second year, denny has shown below average developement. overall if we spend 3 2nd rounders on DEs and get two quality starters, and can sign DTs (an outstanding DT is quite hard to find, and we have 2, although they are in the later stage of their carrers) then we are way ahead of the game.
I think it is important to notice that we have spent only 1 first round pick on the D since our first year (clements) under TD, but we have signed 4 first rounders in Adams, Spikes, Vincent, and Spikes. we ended up losing a 1st rounder as well in Bailey.
I still think we have a team that is very close to being very good for perhaps quite some time, but we need linemen on O very badly.
There's truth to the saying Buffalo is a drinking town with a football problem, where a passionate fan base believes it has more answers than Ken Jennings on "Jeopardy."
by bailey i mean winfield, and kelsay outplayed the mega million dollar probowler all world DEs on the Jets roster today, if we can get a legit pass rush from our front 4 then this season could get interesting
Comment