New "BCS" style power rankings for NFL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GreenMachine
    Registered User
    • Sep 2004
    • 129

    New "BCS" style power rankings for NFL

    I came up with a formula similar to that of the BCS to rank NFL teams. Here are the results.


    1) Pittsburgh (2.794)
    2) Philadelphia (3.651)
    3) New England(4.111)
    4) Indianapolis (7.317)
    5) Denver (8.825)
    6) NYJ (8.889)
    7) San Diego (9.032)
    8) Atlanta (9.317)
    9) Jacksonville (9.857)
    10) Baltimore (10.286)
    11) Minnesota (11.778)
    12) NYG (12.937)
    13) Houston (14.286)
    14) Green Bay (15.381)
    15) Seattle (15.746)
    16) Kansas City (16.794)
    17) Cleveland (18.143)
    18) Buffalo (18.556)
    19) Detroit (18.905)
    20) Tennessee (19.079)
    21) Cincinatti (19.095)
    22) Tampa Bay (19.333)
    23) St. Louis (20.016)
    24) Washington (21.540)
    25) Dallas (22.444)
    26) Chicago (25.587)
    27) Oakland (25.825)
    28) New Orleans (26.016)
    29) Carolina (27.111)
    30) Arizona (27.651)
    31) Miami (28.079)
    32) San Francisco(29.619)
  • NapalmDeath
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 1120

    #2
    Not to shabby. Buffalo at 18 at this point is reasonable. But St.Louis at 23? Don't know about that, but the NFC is WEAK.



    There's truth to the saying Buffalo is a drinking town with a football problem, where a passionate fan base believes it has more answers than Ken Jennings on "Jeopardy."

    Comment

    • jbisset
      Registered User
      • Oct 2002
      • 224

      #3
      Pretty good....Rams and lions seem a little low...How does your formula work?

      Comment

      • Tatonka
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 21289

        #4
        that is pretty nice.. to see our name above some of those others.
        "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

        Comment

        • Earthquake Enyart
          Legendary Zoner
          • Jul 2002
          • 27521

          #5
          Jets 6th

          Comment

          Working...
          X