David Boston or Peerless Price ?

[Alluro]

I noticed both players are free agents at the end of the year. IMO the bills would be better served to spend franchise receiver money on Boston as opposed to price. Boston is arguably the most talented receiver in the league.

[clumping platelets]

Better to keep a player familar with the team......keep Price.

[The_Philster]

Exactly....even though Boston may be a better overall player, there's no way of knowing if he'll be as productive in Gilbride's systems. We KNOW Peerless is.

[JefftheBillsfan]

besides, I bet Boston will cost a lot more. And Price's speed is a great compliment to Mould's size. Boston and Moulds are too similar to compliment each other IMO.

[Alluro]

Boston is bigger, faster, and stronger than peerless. He has proven he can be a marquee player in NFL without the benefit of playing with another all-pro. Is peerless really this good, or is moulds attracting a lot of attention away from him? It would be a bold move, but i believe that if we're going to pay franchise receiver money to a player, he better be a bona fide franchise guy. That player is David Boston

[Dozerdog]

Boston might help the Bills keep price. Whomever signs Boston, that's one less team in need of a big $$ WR

[DraftBoy]

I like Price better than Boston. Boston is goning to want to be the #1 guy we already have that in Moulds, it could create a problem in ball distribution.

[SoCalBillsFan]

Boston is the better receiver.

that being said, keep price, he IS a better complement to moulds, and we know they can co-exist. Dont mess with good chemistry

[Typ0]

I almost think we should let price go if need be and use the space to really prop up the D. Reed has been great every time he is being called on. It looks like he is really vieing for a number two spot. I like Price but if letting him go means we have room to get not just good DE, DT, LB but excellent DE, DT, LB then we need to consider taking a bit of a loss at the receiver position. If we can have our cake and eat it too of course that would be the best alternative.

[lordofgun]

Originally posted by Alluro
Boston is bigger, faster, and stronger than peerless. He has proven he can be a marquee player in NFL without the benefit of playing with another all-pro. Is peerless really this good, or is moulds attracting a lot of attention away from him? It would be a bold move, but i believe that if we're going to pay franchise receiver money to a player, he better be a bona fide franchise guy. That player is David Boston

I agree completely...as long as Boston is healthy.

[SoCalBillsFan]

I dont question that boston is a franchise guy. But do we need another franchise WR? Two on the same team? And thats a lot of money locked up in the WR spot.

I think peerless will be significantly less money, and will take a home team discount I hope. He LOVEs playing for drew, he can co-exist with Moulds, the offense as it is now is clicking well together, they enjoy playing together. I dont want to mess with that.

I'd rather keep peerless, who is very capable but not as good as boston, for a cheaper price and keep the chemistry, then spend more money on another wide receiver when it needs to be spent on defense. IMHO, of course...

[clumping platelets]

Go for two when we score a TD

[The_Philster]

Originally posted by clumping platelets
Go for two when we score a TD

I think you're in the wrong thread.

[Bert102176]

Price knows the system, and is familiar with the other players you keep him over getting someone like Boston who doesn't know the familiararities of this team, plus Price will probably be cheaper than Boston, who knows if Boston will over come the injury he has
even.

[Cntrygal]

I like Price... but he needs to keep his mouth shut! :madfire: