Tweet
Why cut this guy? He was supposed to be one of the WRs of the future after last year. He would have been a good #3 when Peerless walked for more money. Who's that leave as #3? Another rookie? Charles Johnson? Thoughts....
-
Originally posted by BillsZone Mod
-
He failed a physical. -
Injured or not injured, I would of rather the Bills kept Jeremy McDaniel than Charles Johnson. McDaniel can sit on the bench just as well as CJ and is much younger. I do like the leadership qualities CJ bring, but I think we could have found a veteran elsewhere.Its all about the quest.Comment
-
McDaniel went with the 9ers, then got injured there. I would rather have CJ, who can atleast stay healthy, than McDaniel who would be a waste of money and injured the whole year.
McDaniel has some serious potential, but IMO wont be able to use it because hes too injury prone.Comment
-
could this possibly mean that we might lock up price too?Originally posted by yordad
Comment
Comment