If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Why cut this guy? He was supposed to be one of the WRs of the future after last year. He would have been a good #3 when Peerless walked for more money. Who's that leave as #3? Another rookie? Charles Johnson? Thoughts....
Originally posted by BillsZone Mod
cas,
I'm just letting you know that you have been given 2 points for telling Wys AKA Mark to kill himself.
Injured or not injured, I would of rather the Bills kept Jeremy McDaniel than Charles Johnson. McDaniel can sit on the bench just as well as CJ and is much younger. I do like the leadership qualities CJ bring, but I think we could have found a veteran elsewhere.
McDaniel went with the 9ers, then got injured there. I would rather have CJ, who can atleast stay healthy, than McDaniel who would be a waste of money and injured the whole year.
McDaniel has some serious potential, but IMO wont be able to use it because hes too injury prone.
Comment