here is an article that needs to be read.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • DIHARD2
    Registered User
    • Sep 2002
    • 1214
    #1

    here is an article that needs to be read.

    I got this off the BB board, the one poster there wyo, has lots of good material that she brings to that Board.

    So I hope she doesn't mind that I stole this from her. But it's interesting to see that the Chiefs own newspaper has a comment about the poor officiating!


    http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/4543861.htm?4543861.htm
    "The right of free speech is the God given right of each man to make an ass of himself." B Franklin
    Tags: None
  • DIHARD2
    Registered User
    • Sep 2002
    • 1214
    #2
    If you read at the end of this article,and if you were (paranoid), you would think that because the joint Chief of Staff was at the game, the cards were stacked against us. But you would only thing that way if you're paranoid LoL. He Graduated from a Kansas City college!

    GO!!!...BUFFALO!!!...
    "The right of free speech is the God given right of each man to make an ass of himself." B Franklin

    Comment

    • venis2k1
      Youboty can hope
      • Jul 2002
      • 4621
      #3
      a blind man could see that the officiating sucks

      Comment

      • DIHARD2
        Registered User
        • Sep 2002
        • 1214
        #4
        True, True, True!!!!!!!!!!! LoL

        GO!!!...BUFFALO!!!...
        "The right of free speech is the God given right of each man to make an ass of himself." B Franklin

        Comment

        • JJamezz
           

          Administrator Emeritus
          • Jul 2002
          • 5626
          #5
          Obviously the officiating was horrific Sunday, but this guy sure isn't helping the cause with that article... Out of the three examples he uses, the first two were legitimate calls - Mr. friggin Magoo could have seen Moulds was out of bounds, and he says it was 'inconclusive', and the roughing call on Edwards, while 'soft', was a good call.

          Obviously the Watson call was ridiculous, and he should have mentioned the pass interference 'non' call where Moulds was manhandled late in the game.

          Comment

          • Typ0
            honey pie
            • Jul 2002
            • 32593
            #6
            I too thought the Moulds call was inconclusive. While it might look like his foot was on the line there was no conclusive camera shot to show it was so. It is possible there was a small amount of green between his shoe and the line and the camera angles provided would not have revealed that. I don't expect a camera everywhere but to me it looked like there was no definative evidence he was out of bounds even though to the human eye viewing the tape he looked out of bounds. Especially with that one shot where his white shoe mixed in with the white of the line because the camera was above and behind the play. This was very misleading as to how close of a call it was.

            Comment

            • WCoastFin
              I have the arms of a new born baby!
              • Jul 2002
              • 1701
              #7
              stop your crying and whining get over it!, let it go, time to move on.....We beat the Jets with a Chambers TD and more when Ricky DIDNT fumble....but you have to get over it and move on....if your team is really that good they can repair games like that.
              We wanna see you spit now!!!lets face it we suck.

              Comment

              • 4thAndLong
                I'm Really 4 and Short
                • Sep 2002
                • 2274
                #8
                Stop our whining? Do I have to bring up Ray Lucas threads?

                Chambers catch wasn't a TD, and there was not enough evidence to show Ricky didn't fumble.

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                X