If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
I haven't been able to watch to many games, so correct me if I'm wrong....
I'd think that because of the way special teams and the defense have been playing lately, we'd be in short field situations most of the time. As many people that have been complaining about our offensive woes, I'm hoping they would take this into consideration.
I haven't been able to watch to many games, so correct me if I'm wrong....
I'd think that because of the way special teams and the defense have been playing lately, we'd be in short field situations most of the time. As many people that have been complaining about our offensive woes, I'm hoping they would take this into consideration.
Feedback?
I don't understand what you're saying.
Originally posted by LOSman WINS
Vanek is Austrian not European
Originally posted by Prov401
Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
Originally posted by better days
I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.
I guess what I'm asking is... Does it matter if we don't throw for 300 yards and run for 100 yards when our defense is so dominant? The offense seems to be scoring when it needs to be and we are winning games, so why complain? As for not playing the best teams excuse, are there really any dominate teams out there right now? Watching the past few weeks of football, I'd say that is a big fat NO.
Sorry, I'm just pumped about our team right now and I believe only two letters matter at the end of the day. As long as we end up with the 'W', I could care less about how much DB sucks or that we have a rookie coach. Let's hope the cards fall our way this weekend and we better our chances to get in the Playoffs. We might not go all the way to the Super Bowl, but I know this team will give whoever we play hell.
Okay, I'll get down off my soapbox now and stop my Oh, and one more thing...
It don't mean anything unless the O has to march 95 yards on every drive and get 14 points every drive. Anything less? Total ineptitude.
Marching 80 yards total after getting the ball within thier field and coming out with six points sucks. Good thing Lindell wasn't his sucky self there too...lmao.
What difference does it make how many yards it takes? Bettis got three TD's in a game on only ONE net yard rushing. Just give me more points than the other guys get. If the other guys get none...even better! How we get 'em? Who cares? We get 'em, they don't, game over.
Someone said "What's he gonna turn out like?" Ha!
And someone else said "Never mind!"
-Deep Purple
"Have you ever taken a crap so big your pants fit better?"--Ron White
the ravens won a superbowl with trent dilfer at the qb. need i say more. defense wins championships-look at parcells, belichek,billick,lombardi,landry, just to name a few.
Balance. Billick, I concede, won mostly with a smothering defense. However, Parcells, Lombardi and Landry had pretty efficient offenses, even though they didn't light up the scoreboard light a Christmas tree. Parcell's offense held the ball nearly 40 minutes in SB XXV. Lombardi had Bart Starr, Max McGee, Elijah Pitts and Boyd Dowler. Landry's "Doomsday Defense" was well complimented by the likes of Roger Staubach, Duane Thomas, Mike Ditka, "Bullet" Bob Hayes and the like. Add Chuck Noll to that latter group as well, with his Steel Curtain on one side and Bradshaw, Harris, Swann, Stallworth, and one hell of an offensive line.
Someone said "What's he gonna turn out like?" Ha!
And someone else said "Never mind!"
-Deep Purple
"Have you ever taken a crap so big your pants fit better?"--Ron White
It don't mean anything unless the O has to march 95 yards on every drive and get 14 points every drive. Anything less? Total ineptitude.
Com'on Helmet, didnt you know Peyton drives 96 yards everytime they score? Every good offense never gets a short field, they all drive 90 yards!
Get with the program!!
What difference does it make how many yards it takes? Bettis got three TD's in a game on only ONE net yard rushing. Just give me more points than the other guys get. If the other guys get none...even better! How we get 'em? Who cares? We get 'em, they don't, game over.
Thats just crazy talk. You act like actually watch football or something! It doesnt matter how many we score, whatmatters is how we scored them!
The funny thing was at the beginning of the year when the bills O had short fields ala the Reese int in the Jags game, we *****ed because they didnt put it in, and rightly so, now people are *****ing because they didnt drive 80 yds to put it in.
As long as we are able to take advantage of what our D and ST gives us, I'm happy. Prblem is, when our D and ST gives our O a short field, we come out w/ 3 pts. We should be scoring 50 points based on what our D and ST is doing but it isn't happening.
I haven't been able to watch to many games, so correct me if I'm wrong....
I'd think that because of the way special teams and the defense have been playing lately, we'd be in short field situations most of the time. As many people that have been complaining about our offensive woes, I'm hoping they would take this into consideration.
Feedback?
Have taken it into consideration plenty. BTW, Who's complaining we don't score on long drives? Just the opposite. There're problems scoring TDs with the MANY short fields the O gets, (courtesy of the D and ST). We've had very good starting position, yet many times settle for FG's. That's a big offensive woe imo, if that trend continues.
I don't care if we start at, for example, our 5 or the opponents' 40, as long we can score more TDs than FG's, and more points than opponents, it's all good.
But I'd have to say that driving from our 5 and settling for a FG is a better trend than if we had to settle for one starting at their 40. Both drive lengths resulting on FG's reveal a problem regarding red zone scoring, but at least a 5-yard start shows the ability to sustain a drive and give our D a rest.
I'll live with that over the short-field scenario of FGs and 3-and-outs.
Comment