PDA

View Full Version : New FP Poll



northernbillfan
01-14-2005, 11:42 AM
I just put a new poll up on our front page and already 67% have voted to keep Drew as the starting QB for 2005.

The King
01-14-2005, 11:46 AM
75-25 now

northernbillfan
01-14-2005, 11:51 AM
71-29

Vote here (http://www.billszone.com/)

Mr. Cynical
01-14-2005, 05:35 PM
JP - 45
Drew - 39
Cut Drew - 15

So that is 60% against Drew.

The realists must have just started logging in. :D

FTG
01-14-2005, 05:53 PM
JP - 45
Drew - 39
Cut Drew - 15

So that is 60% against Drew.

The realists must have just started logging in. :D

:up: Amigos :mex:

lordofgun
01-14-2005, 05:58 PM
49% JP
38% Drew
14% other

That's a mandate to cut drew!

Mr. Cynical
01-14-2005, 06:19 PM
49% JP
38% Drew
14% other

That's a mandate to cut drew!
To dream the dream....someday. :;

FTG
01-14-2005, 06:34 PM
I guess 60% of the voters are not "true" Bills fans

jmb1099
01-14-2005, 06:38 PM
I have been a Drew supporter since he arrived and in many ways I guess I am. But after the debacle against Pitsburgh I can no longer be supportive of him as our starting qb. The loss may or may not have been entirely his fault, but I truly believe that JP could and would have won that game. Aside from that I think the Bills organization needs to help Drew leave with some dignity. He played well throughout his career, but he has always lacked that killer instinct to get it done. I had hoped the new regeime would help him find it, they almost did, but almost has been Drew's calling card throughout his career. Still I wish him the best and I hope he finds success somewhere, but his time with us is done.

northernbillfan
01-15-2005, 03:58 AM
I guess 60% of the voters are not "true" Bills fans
Huh???

What a difference a few hours make.

JP 43%
Drew 40%
FA 17%

Matthews would have done a better job against Pitt.

Philagape
01-15-2005, 06:49 AM
The question is not who should have been the QB; it's who it should be next year.

jamze132
01-15-2005, 09:08 AM
I didn't see the choice for Morman on there. Didn't he have a better passer rating than Drew?

Michael82
01-15-2005, 09:38 AM
Matthews would have done a better job against Pitt.
:roflmao:

FTG
01-15-2005, 10:22 AM
:roflmao:

whats so funny about that? You don't think Matthews could matched/beat the pathetic game Drew played?

Philagape
01-15-2005, 10:59 AM
The sad truth is that the Bills simply did not have a dependable QB on the roster last year.

Michael82
01-15-2005, 11:45 AM
whats so funny about that? You don't think Matthews could matched/beat the pathetic game Drew played?
Against the Steelers? Nope. Drew only had 1 INT and 3 sacks. Matthews would have had at least 3 INTs and 5 sacks. :ill:

Philagape
01-15-2005, 12:20 PM
Considering the INTs the Steelers dropped, that means Matthews would have really thrown six

FTG
01-15-2005, 12:23 PM
Against the Steelers? Nope. Drew only had 1 INT and 3 sacks. Matthews would have had at least 3 INTs and 5 sacks. :ill:

and just how do you know that?

DaBills
01-15-2005, 12:56 PM
It's now

51% - JP

33% - Drew

16% - other

NEVER underestimate the ability of an Amigo to swing an election.


;-p

ArcticWildMan
01-15-2005, 01:21 PM
Viva los amigos!!! :beer:

Iehoshua
01-15-2005, 02:14 PM
:mex:

69% in favor of a new starting QB...