What is the definition of a dynasty in the NFL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • imbondz
    Democrats are people too
    • Jan 2003
    • 26041

    What is the definition of a dynasty in the NFL?

    how many championships constitute a dynasty? In the NFL, these have been dynasties in my opinion:

    '70's Steelers
    '70's Dolphins
    '70's Cowboys
    80's 49ers
    mid'80's - '85 Chicago Bears
    90's Cowboys

    The Patriots have won 2 Super Bowls on last second field goals. They barely beat the Rams and the Panthers. They made the AFC championship game thanks to the 'just give it to them' call. Yes, they are a great team, but a dynasty? I have a problem calling them that. They win alot. But do they crush their opponents like the Cowboys of the '90's, the '80's 49ers etc.

    Are the '97 '98 Broncos with John Elway considered a dynasty? They won two SBs. I don't think they are. They didn't crush their opponents like the teams I listed, and I think that needs to be considered when labelling teams dynasties. The '90's Bills might get an AFC dynasty nod, but that's about it.

    k.
    My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.

  • Ickybaluky
    Registered User
    • Jul 2003
    • 8884

    #2
    Originally posted by imbondz
    But do they crush their opponents like the Cowboys of the '90's, the '80's 49ers etc.
    The Pats have played a lot of close games prior to 2004, but they won much easier this year.

    Consider:

    - They led the NFL in Point Difference (+177)

    - Of their 15 victories this year, the margin of victory was double-digits in 11 of them. All but 2 of their wins were by at least a touchdown.

    - In only one of their 15 wins was the margin of victory less than 6 points (they beat Indy 27-24 in week 1).


    During their current run of success, the Pats were generally very strong on defense and ST. They have consistenly been among the better teams in turnover difference, 3rd down conversion percentage and red zone defense. However, on offense they were middle-of-the pack because they didn't have a strong running game, despite having a pretty good passing game.

    This year, the offense has improved tremendously (7th in NFL in yardage, 4th in NFL in points, 7th in rushing yardage, 11th in passing yardage), mainly due to the addition of Corey Dillon. With Dillon, the Pats are able to be more balanced on offense and are able to run out the clock at the end of games. That has led to greater margins of victory.

    Comment

    • G. Host
      Banned
      • Jul 2002
      • 10298

      #3
      I think like in history the definition of a dynasty has changed. In the far past dynasties lasted hundreds or thousands of years - Egypt, China, etc. And then dynasties became shorter and shorter - Greece, Roman, etc and now it is one lasting a few hundred.

      No team today is a dynasty by old definiton and I disagree that Bears were a dynasty but it all depends whether you are willing to redefine the definition of the word.

      Comment

      • RedEyE
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 24661

        #4
        Won't matter really. The Pats will go down this weekend, and will have ahard time doing anything next season without their OC and DC. There is definitly no NE dynasaty.

        Comment

        • Tatonka
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 21289

          #5
          the pats are a dynasty.
          "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

          Comment

          • ajsdx
            Registered User
            • Aug 2003
            • 1436

            #6
            If they win this year's SB, they are a definite contend-with-any-other-team-of-all-time dynasty. If they don't, it's still a dynasty, but prolly not one of the greatest in NFL history.

            Comment

            • Jeff1220
              H to the 12:20
              • Jul 2002
              • 6136

              #7
              Before FA, a dynasty would have certainly included any 4 SBs within a decade winner and a three within a decade winner that was right in the thick of it the rest of the time.
              In this day and age of player movement and FA, I'd say 2 in a row is very close to a dynasty. If the Pats win it this year, giving them 3 SB wins in 4 years, they are, without a doubt, a dynasty.

              Comment

              • Ebenezer
                Give me a minute...
                • Jul 2002
                • 73868

                #8
                Originally posted by ajsdx
                If they win this year's SB, they are a definite contend-with-any-other-team-of-all-time dynasty. If they don't, it's still a dynasty, but prolly not one of the greatest in NFL history.
                agree




                For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

                Comment

                • pats-were-right
                  Just paint a target on my forehead
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 342

                  #9
                  Originally posted by imbondz
                  They made the AFC championship game thanks to the 'just give it to them' call.

                  What call would that be? Please cite call, rule, and way in which rules were misinterpreted.

                  Lips puckering from 'dem sour grapes?

                  Comment

                  • Mr. Cynical
                    Maybe?
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 9766

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ajsdx
                    If they win this year's SB, they are a definite contend-with-any-other-team-of-all-time dynasty. If they don't, it's still a dynasty, but prolly not one of the greatest in NFL history.
                    yep

                    Comment

                    • Mudflap1
                      Next Question!
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 3281

                      #11
                      The Pats probably have the most underrated offensive line in the NFL. At any rate, if they win this year, they're a dynasty. Just doesn't make them the greatest one.


                      Jon

                      Comment

                      • jamze132
                        Registered User
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 29290

                        #12
                        You guys wanna talk about a dynasty? Well it goes both ways. Dynasty's are normally forged from winning. But what about the recent Buffalo Bills? There are such things as losing dynasty's. It just blows that Buffalo could be in that mix!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X