Michael82
02-18-2005, 09:34 AM
Walter Jones’ new contract with the Seattle Seahawks covers the next seven NFL seasons.
Simple, right? Not so fast.
The salary cap implications of Jones’ deal span only five years thanks to the league’s labor agreement.
As a result, Jones’ contract will consume $1.01 million more in 2005 salary cap space than reported Wednesday. The case illustrates why the Seahawks are paying a premium for allowing so many high-profile players to approach free agency this year.
The penalty stems from the absence of a salary cap for the 2007 season. The league and its players have yet to extend the collective bargaining agreement, leaving 2005 and 2006 as the last two seasons with a cap in place.
Before 2004, teams could spread the salary cap costs of signing bonuses over as many as seven seasons. If a team paid a $16 million bonus with a seven-year deal, for example, one-seventh of the bonus would count against the cap in a single year.
That fractional figure, when combined with the player’s base salary in a given year, would produce the “cap numbers” familiar to anyone with the stamina to follow free agency.
As the uncapped 2007 season approaches, however, the NFL’s labor agreement calls for reductions in the number of years a team can apply toward diluting the cap implications of bonuses. The number fell to six years in 2004 and five in 2005, with a four-year period allowed for contracts agreed upon in 2006.
The numbers could change if the league and players extend their agreement, but contracts signed in the meantime will count according to existing guidelines. That’s why teams with more free agents are feeling the pinch.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/story/4609398p-4282948c.html
Simple, right? Not so fast.
The salary cap implications of Jones’ deal span only five years thanks to the league’s labor agreement.
As a result, Jones’ contract will consume $1.01 million more in 2005 salary cap space than reported Wednesday. The case illustrates why the Seahawks are paying a premium for allowing so many high-profile players to approach free agency this year.
The penalty stems from the absence of a salary cap for the 2007 season. The league and its players have yet to extend the collective bargaining agreement, leaving 2005 and 2006 as the last two seasons with a cap in place.
Before 2004, teams could spread the salary cap costs of signing bonuses over as many as seven seasons. If a team paid a $16 million bonus with a seven-year deal, for example, one-seventh of the bonus would count against the cap in a single year.
That fractional figure, when combined with the player’s base salary in a given year, would produce the “cap numbers” familiar to anyone with the stamina to follow free agency.
As the uncapped 2007 season approaches, however, the NFL’s labor agreement calls for reductions in the number of years a team can apply toward diluting the cap implications of bonuses. The number fell to six years in 2004 and five in 2005, with a four-year period allowed for contracts agreed upon in 2006.
The numbers could change if the league and players extend their agreement, but contracts signed in the meantime will count according to existing guidelines. That’s why teams with more free agents are feeling the pinch.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/story/4609398p-4282948c.html