PDA

View Full Version : David Terrell Released by Bears


Romes
02-28-2005, 04:19 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2001961

He is tall and fast and only 25. He hasn't lived up to expectations but he was the 8th overall pick in 2001. He could be good as a 3rd option here in Buffalo.

Assuming, of course, he isn't looking for more than the vet minimum
Devin
02-28-2005, 04:21 PM
yeah not bad at all.
The_Philster
02-28-2005, 04:23 PM
I'd take him for a small contract...couldn't hurt to bring him in, anyway :idunno:
Dozerdog
02-28-2005, 04:24 PM
I'd rather keep Josh Reed. Terrell sucks and there is nothing worse than a WR that sucks with a big mouth.
Crisis
02-28-2005, 04:28 PM
Pass. Our WRs are fine.
RedEyE
02-28-2005, 04:28 PM
Now, is that pronounced "TEAR-al" or "Ter- ELLE" ?
Meathead
02-28-2005, 04:30 PM
Has there been a bigger flop top 10 WR pick in the last decade? I can't think of any. Reed might still come around.
Crisis
02-28-2005, 04:30 PM
The latter.
Jayhawk
02-28-2005, 04:35 PM
we don't need a druggie on the team
Dozerdog
02-28-2005, 04:36 PM
What pick was Desmond Howard?
Mudflap1
02-28-2005, 04:37 PM
We need OVER-achievers on this team, not UNDER-achievers.

Jon
SoCalBillsFan
02-28-2005, 04:41 PM
I would much rather let Reed be the 3rd WR, I still think he can play.
TigerJ
02-28-2005, 05:02 PM
For the right price, sure I'd think about it.
Jersey1031
02-28-2005, 05:19 PM
we gave reed his chance, always seems to come through with dropping an important 3rd down ball. bring terrell in for cheap and ill like it. cant hurt to bring in some competition to let who ever win it, huh?
BAM
02-28-2005, 05:22 PM
I'd take him over J.R.
The_Philster
02-28-2005, 05:36 PM
What pick was Desmond Howard?

4th overall by the Skins in the 92 Draft
BADTHINGSMAN
02-28-2005, 10:22 PM
Much bigger needs to spend money on than another WR.. Even if its for cheap..
Earthquake Enyart
03-01-2005, 06:10 AM
Pass on Terrell. He has all the moves, for the end zone dancing. Too bad he doesn't score.
Jan Reimers
03-01-2005, 06:47 AM
Why bring in one underachiever for another, i.e., Reed? If we're going to bring in a potential 3rd receiver, why not a guy with a good attitude and some productivity?
ryjam282
03-01-2005, 07:10 AM
I agree, he has definitely been a disapointment in his career. Pass
bigbub2352
03-01-2005, 07:24 AM
i think david terrel would be a good fit only as number three but i wouldn't over pay for him i like alex bannister from seattle pro bowl two yrs as a special teams player had him in here last year as a restricted free agennt 6'5 215lbs under utilized by seattle
Dozerdog
03-01-2005, 07:46 AM
:welcome: bigbub!
Jan Reimers
03-01-2005, 07:47 AM
i think david terrel would be a good fit only as number three but i wouldn't over pay for him i like alex bannister from seattle pro bowl two yrs as a special teams player had him in here last year as a restricted free agennt 6'5 215lbs under utilized by seattle
I agree. Bannister seems to have a better attitude, is a good special teamer, and could blossom into a nice 3rd receiver. I'd rather we spend our limited capital on him.
bigbub2352
03-01-2005, 07:55 AM
he also runs a 4.3 with that size nice compliment to our current two starters evans and moulds i don't think aiken is the answer
The King
03-01-2005, 08:07 AM
Terrell is gonna bring in big bucks. I think he is a guy who needs to play for a hard ass coach who will ground him and I bet he is successful. Not too mention the QB's he has had throwing his way. They have been less than respectable, Miller, Stewart, and Grossman. Couple of Terrell stats that go unoticed. 42 rec's 35 of them for a 1st down.
16.6 YPC and 4.1 YAC. Those are big numbers with the right coaching Terrell will be a weapon.