If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
His performance seemed to be trailing off a bit, but he's still very effective. This would be an interesting move for the Vikes. They've been trying to build a good defense for the past few seasons, and by getting Harris in the Moss trade and if they can sign Pat, that will go a long way towards making them better defensively.
His performance seemed to be trailing off a bit, but he's still very effective. This would be an interesting move for the Vikes. They've been trying to build a good defense for the past few seasons, and by getting Harris in the Moss trade and if they can sign Pat, that will go a long way towards making them better defensively.
Good point Rich. And don't forget Winfield and a young Udeze at DE.
The problem is they are making their defense significantly stronger while making their offense worse by trading Moss. So, overall I'm not sure they will be any better.
I like the Vikings as well mainly because of Winfield. Yes he was overrated, overpaid last offseason but he always played hard for us and you gotta love the hits the kid made especially the 1 on Glenn.
The problem is they are making their defense significantly stronger while making their offense worse by trading Moss. So, overall I'm not sure they will be any better.
It think it's better to be balanced than to be loaded on just one side. Case in point: The Pats have owned the Colts recently.
"It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther
"Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill
2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
The problem is they are making their defense significantly stronger while making their offense worse by trading Moss. So, overall I'm not sure they will be any better.
Any offense that loses a guy who has been as productive as Moss would have a dropoff after losing him. They do have the 7th overall pick, though, which will enable them to get a pretty good WR (if that's what they're going after). Imagine if they are able to draft Mike Williams to replace Moss. They'd suffer a dropoff, but it wouldn't be catastrophic.
Comment