If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Buffalo has Teague who can play center and tackle, Tucker who can play guard or center, Villarreal who is strictly a guard, Williams who is strictly a tackle (though he could probably move to guard), Gandy who can play anywhere on the line, Peters who is being groomed as a tackle Dylan McFarland and David Pruce (2 unproven tackles) and Laawrence Smith (a fringe player who can play tackle or guard). There is enough versatility to make either DeMulling or Womack work, but I think we're a little thinner at tackle in terms of players we're really comfortable with. Thus, I would rather see Womack signed over DeMulling.
I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
Demulling is better than Womak but there are hardly any OT's in the draft so that being said I would much rather have Demulling but I wouldn't be unhappy if we signed Womak and took a guard in the draft.
Tweet
Comment