If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Tomlinson
Holmes
James
Alexander
McGahee
Dillon
R.Johnson
Taylor
Lewis
Martin
I would have McAllister at 11 and Green would be somewhere in the top 15 IMO
I don't think Willis should be that high on the list, if even on the list...yet.
Willis may not have had a huge season yet. but consider what he was running behind. With regards to pure running ability, I think he does belong in the top ten.
i think priest is about 9th or 10th when he went out their running game didnt miss a beat. hes the year 2004 emmitt smith doesnt get hit for 5 yards IMO
I don't know if I would put Willis as high as you did but if he continues to play the way he has or better then it won't be long before he gets up there.
Willis may not have had a huge season yet. but consider what he was running behind. With regards to pure running ability, I think he does belong in the top ten.
Well it wasnt the exact same line and Willis was getting most of his yardage after contact behind or at the LOS. Not to mention how many times he got stuffed due to a lack of a hole. Willis earned his yards with his abilities is my point.
Comment