trade proposal at end of rant
I've seen many people believe that it's all but over with respects to the prospect of re-signing Nate Clements. It ignores the fact that Bills GM Tom Donahoe is willing to re-sign or sign "elite" players to market value contracts. Cases in point: WR Eric Moulds, LB Takeo Spikes, and DE Aaron Schobel. All 3 players were young and widely recognized as among the best at thier respective positions when they were signed. Moulds rec'd a $12 million signing bonus plus other $1 million reporting bonuses. Spikes rec's $10.5 million in guaranteed money over his 1st 2 yrs here. Schobel has rec'd $9 million in guaranteed money over 2 yrs.
The criticisms obviously stem from the inactivity this off-season and the loss of both OT Jonas Jennings and DT Pat Williams. Clearly, Jennings was not even close to "elite" status but still rec'd $12 million bonus. Bills offered P. Williams a contract before 2004 season that was a couple of million less than what he signed with Minnesota. Bills made a competitive offer to Williams but he chose a bit more money, contradicting his previous comments of taking less to stay.
Who else has he passed up re-signing? DE Marcellus Wiley.....nuff said; WR Peerless Price....grossly overpaid by the Falcons and we rec'd a 1st rd pick used to draft some RB named Willis. CB Winfield....good CB who rec'd elite CB money....the defense was better without him.
I advance the hypothesis that Nate Clements is near elite status and TD will make a very competitive offer because he recognizes that Nate fits in the same mold as Moulds, etc. Will he re-sign? That remains to be seen.
This being said, how would y'all feel about this proposal:
Cardinals have been rumored to be interested in CB Antrel Rolle at #8 if they can add Travis Henry. However, I wonder if they would consider.....
CB Nate Clements, RB Travis Henry, cond 2006 to Arizona for OL L. J. Shelton, RB Marcel Shipp, 1st rd 05 (#8), cond 06.
Bills then select CB Antrel Rolle at #8 (Rolle must be available at #8 to make deal), add a capable veteran RB in Shipp to back-up McGahee, and upgrade LT from what we presently have. Cards get a #1 RB and #1 CB. Let them worry about re-signing both.
Cond 06 based on production and if Cards re-sign one or both
Bills could also add a veteran CB after the draft for depth. We have "Fast Freddie" Smith to handle PR duties.
LATE EDIT: From a cap perspective. Trading Clements frees up $2.675 million ($2.5 million salary and $175,000 reporting bonus). Trading Henry frees up $1.25 million. That's a total of $3.925 million. Shelton's cap hit is $3 million each of the next 4 yrs. Shipp's cap hit is $1.425 million each of the next 2 yrs. Do a simple restructure of Shelton's salary from $3 million to $665,000, frees up $1,751,250. The trade would result in cap savings of $1,296,250 (if Shelton restructured) and that would be directed at signing the rookies
I've seen many people believe that it's all but over with respects to the prospect of re-signing Nate Clements. It ignores the fact that Bills GM Tom Donahoe is willing to re-sign or sign "elite" players to market value contracts. Cases in point: WR Eric Moulds, LB Takeo Spikes, and DE Aaron Schobel. All 3 players were young and widely recognized as among the best at thier respective positions when they were signed. Moulds rec'd a $12 million signing bonus plus other $1 million reporting bonuses. Spikes rec's $10.5 million in guaranteed money over his 1st 2 yrs here. Schobel has rec'd $9 million in guaranteed money over 2 yrs.
The criticisms obviously stem from the inactivity this off-season and the loss of both OT Jonas Jennings and DT Pat Williams. Clearly, Jennings was not even close to "elite" status but still rec'd $12 million bonus. Bills offered P. Williams a contract before 2004 season that was a couple of million less than what he signed with Minnesota. Bills made a competitive offer to Williams but he chose a bit more money, contradicting his previous comments of taking less to stay.
Who else has he passed up re-signing? DE Marcellus Wiley.....nuff said; WR Peerless Price....grossly overpaid by the Falcons and we rec'd a 1st rd pick used to draft some RB named Willis. CB Winfield....good CB who rec'd elite CB money....the defense was better without him.
I advance the hypothesis that Nate Clements is near elite status and TD will make a very competitive offer because he recognizes that Nate fits in the same mold as Moulds, etc. Will he re-sign? That remains to be seen.
This being said, how would y'all feel about this proposal:
Cardinals have been rumored to be interested in CB Antrel Rolle at #8 if they can add Travis Henry. However, I wonder if they would consider.....
CB Nate Clements, RB Travis Henry, cond 2006 to Arizona for OL L. J. Shelton, RB Marcel Shipp, 1st rd 05 (#8), cond 06.
Bills then select CB Antrel Rolle at #8 (Rolle must be available at #8 to make deal), add a capable veteran RB in Shipp to back-up McGahee, and upgrade LT from what we presently have. Cards get a #1 RB and #1 CB. Let them worry about re-signing both.
Cond 06 based on production and if Cards re-sign one or both
Bills could also add a veteran CB after the draft for depth. We have "Fast Freddie" Smith to handle PR duties.
LATE EDIT: From a cap perspective. Trading Clements frees up $2.675 million ($2.5 million salary and $175,000 reporting bonus). Trading Henry frees up $1.25 million. That's a total of $3.925 million. Shelton's cap hit is $3 million each of the next 4 yrs. Shipp's cap hit is $1.425 million each of the next 2 yrs. Do a simple restructure of Shelton's salary from $3 million to $665,000, frees up $1,751,250. The trade would result in cap savings of $1,296,250 (if Shelton restructured) and that would be directed at signing the rookies
Comment