My Early Roster Depth Chart

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Yasgur's Farm
    Moderator
    • Feb 2005
    • 7091

    My Early Roster Depth Chart

    Yup... it's well early but here's the way it looks to me at this pont.
  • The Spaz
    Registered User
    • Mar 2003
    • 19066

    #2
    Thomas would not be a FB also where is Villarial?

    Comment

    • The Spaz
      Registered User
      • Mar 2003
      • 19066

      #3
      If we sign Thomas our RB's would be McGahee, Thomas, Gates. Shaud really doesn't seem to fit in with our power running game and we have enough KR and PR on the team for him to even have a shot there.

      Comment

      • Yasgur's Farm
        Moderator
        • Feb 2005
        • 7091

        #4
        Originally posted by The Spaz
        Thomas would not be a FB also where is Villarial?
        Villarrial is #1 G where he should be... I disagree about Thomas not playing FB. I believe McGahee and Thomas in the same backfield would be great.

        Comment

        • The Spaz
          Registered User
          • Mar 2003
          • 19066

          #5
          Originally posted by draz54
          Villarrial is #1 G where he should be... I disagree about Thomas not playing FB. I believe McGahee and Thomas in the same backfield would be great.
          Just like we we're goign to have Henry and McGahee in the same backfield right? McGahee is a workhorse and Thomas or whoever will only come in to give him a breather once in a while.

          Comment

          • Yasgur's Farm
            Moderator
            • Feb 2005
            • 7091

            #6
            That's the nice thing about having an opinion.

            Comment

            • ShadowHawk7
              Ground your Jets Vilma, no way you're shooting this guy down.
              • Mar 2003
              • 2274

              #7
              I liked the last depth chart prediction better. So you don't think any of our UDFAs will make it?
              "It's not whether you win or lose; it's how you play the game."
              -Vince Lombardi

              Comment

              • Yasgur's Farm
                Moderator
                • Feb 2005
                • 7091

                #8
                Originally posted by ShadowHawk7
                I liked the last depth chart prediction better. So you don't think any of our UDFAs will make it?
                I guess my return question would be... What vet or draft pick would you cut to make room for an UDFA?

                Comment

                • dannyek71
                  Drink Responsibly
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 6945

                  #9
                  Isnt that for the most part the same roster and depth chart as last year?
                  [

                  Comment

                  • Jan Reimers
                    Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                    • May 2003
                    • 17353

                    #10
                    I only count 52 players on your list, and I think Neufeld goes, bringing us to 51. I'd guess Gause unseats Ritzmann, Ezekiel makes it as a 7th LB, and Leonhard sticks at safety, which would bring us to 53.

                    Also, Thomas will be a RB if he's acquired, replacing Williams or Gates. With Neufeld gone, we would then have only Shelton at FB. Goldsberry will challenge Burns there.
                    Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                    Comment

                    • The Spaz
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 19066

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                      I only count 52 players on your list, and I think Neufeld goes, bringing us to 51. I'd guess Gause unseats Ritzmann, Ezekiel makes it as a 7th LB, and Leonhard sticks at safety, which would bring us to 53.

                      Also, Thomas will be a RB if he's acquired, replacing Williams or Gates. With Neufeld gone, we would then have only Shelton at FB. Goldsberry will challenge Burns there.
                      I'm thinking right along those lines as well.

                      Comment

                      • Yasgur's Farm
                        Moderator
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 7091

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dannyek71
                        Isnt that for the most part the same roster and depth chart as last year?
                        Nope...
                        Holcomb
                        McGahee
                        Gates
                        A. Thomas
                        Parrish
                        Everett
                        Gandy
                        Anderson
                        Geisinger
                        Preston
                        Ritzmann
                        King
                        ... All new names.
                        Last edited by Yasgur's Farm; 05-01-2005, 07:08 PM.

                        Comment

                        • Yasgur's Farm
                          Moderator
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 7091

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                          I only count 52 players on your list,
                          1) Losman
                          2) Holcomb
                          3) Matthews
                          4) McGahee
                          5) Gates
                          6) S. Williams
                          7) Shelton
                          8) A. Thomas
                          9) Neufeld
                          10) Moulds
                          11) Evans
                          12) Parrish
                          13) Reed
                          14) Aiken
                          15) Campbell
                          16) Everett
                          17) Euhus
                          18) M. Williams
                          19) Gandy
                          20) Peters
                          21) McFarland
                          22) Teague
                          23) Villarrial
                          24) Anderson
                          25) Tucker
                          26) Geisinger
                          27) Preston
                          28) Adams
                          29) Edwards
                          30) Anderson
                          31) Bannan
                          32) Schobel
                          33) Kelsay
                          34) Denney
                          35) Ritzmann
                          36) Spikes
                          37) Posey
                          38) Stamer
                          39) Haggan
                          40) Fletcher
                          41) Crowell
                          42) Milloy
                          43) Wire
                          44) Vincent
                          45) Baker
                          46) Clements
                          47) McGee
                          48) K. Thomas
                          49) Greer
                          50) King
                          51) Lindell
                          52) Moorman
                          53) Dorenbos

                          Comment

                          • Billsouth
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 758

                            #14
                            Originally posted by The Spaz
                            Just like we we're goign to have Henry and McGahee in the same backfield right? McGahee is a workhorse and Thomas or whoever will only come in to give him a breather once in a while.

                            yeah and the raiders thought the same thing w/ bo jackson and marcus.
                            "once a raider always a raider"

                            Comment

                            • TigerJ
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 22575

                              #15
                              Originally posted by draz54
                              Villarrial is #1 G where he should be... I disagree about Thomas not playing FB. I believe McGahee and Thomas in the same backfield would be great.
                              Actually, I think Gates is more likely to end up getting snaps at fullback.
                              I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                              I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X