Yup... it's well early but here's the way it looks to me at this pont.
My Early Roster Depth Chart
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by draz54Villarrial is #1 G where he should be... I disagree about Thomas not playing FB. I believe McGahee and Thomas in the same backfield would be great.
Comment
-
-
I only count 52 players on your list, and I think Neufeld goes, bringing us to 51. I'd guess Gause unseats Ritzmann, Ezekiel makes it as a 7th LB, and Leonhard sticks at safety, which would bring us to 53.
Also, Thomas will be a RB if he's acquired, replacing Williams or Gates. With Neufeld gone, we would then have only Shelton at FB. Goldsberry will challenge Burns there.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jan ReimersI only count 52 players on your list, and I think Neufeld goes, bringing us to 51. I'd guess Gause unseats Ritzmann, Ezekiel makes it as a 7th LB, and Leonhard sticks at safety, which would bring us to 53.
Also, Thomas will be a RB if he's acquired, replacing Williams or Gates. With Neufeld gone, we would then have only Shelton at FB. Goldsberry will challenge Burns there.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dannyek71Isnt that for the most part the same roster and depth chart as last year?
Holcomb
McGahee
Gates
A. Thomas
Parrish
Everett
Gandy
Anderson
Geisinger
Preston
Ritzmann
King
... All new names.Last edited by Yasgur's Farm; 05-01-2005, 07:08 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jan ReimersI only count 52 players on your list,
2) Holcomb
3) Matthews
4) McGahee
5) Gates
6) S. Williams
7) Shelton
8) A. Thomas
9) Neufeld
10) Moulds
11) Evans
12) Parrish
13) Reed
14) Aiken
15) Campbell
16) Everett
17) Euhus
18) M. Williams
19) Gandy
20) Peters
21) McFarland
22) Teague
23) Villarrial
24) Anderson
25) Tucker
26) Geisinger
27) Preston
28) Adams
29) Edwards
30) Anderson
31) Bannan
32) Schobel
33) Kelsay
34) Denney
35) Ritzmann
36) Spikes
37) Posey
38) Stamer
39) Haggan
40) Fletcher
41) Crowell
42) Milloy
43) Wire
44) Vincent
45) Baker
46) Clements
47) McGee
48) K. Thomas
49) Greer
50) King
51) Lindell
52) Moorman
53) Dorenbos
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The SpazJust like we we're goign to have Henry and McGahee in the same backfield right? McGahee is a workhorse and Thomas or whoever will only come in to give him a breather once in a while.
yeah and the raiders thought the same thing w/ bo jackson and marcus."once a raider always a raider"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by draz54Villarrial is #1 G where he should be... I disagree about Thomas not playing FB. I believe McGahee and Thomas in the same backfield would be great.I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
Comment
-
Comment