Worthy of note in the overwhelming boredom that is the NFL off-season.
1. The Bills went to a record four straight Super Bowls in the early 1990's. The so-called "dynasty" of the New England Patriots are only halfway there (although they accomplished something the Bills didn't by winning the SB, they're still a long way from the record).
2. I was watching the 2004 Bills highlights on NFL network. The Bills are in an odd position. Clearly, at the end of last season we showed we are significantly better than middle-of-the-pack teams like Cincinnatti, Seattle and St. Louis. Yet, we still can't beat first tier teams like Pittsburgh and NE. What needs to be done to take the next step?
3. Also in '04, there were numerous "no names" who contributed to our success. Euhus, Peters, and Freddy Smith come immediately to mind. Others did it in less obvious fashion: Stamer, Rashad Baker, etc. Is this the same path that the Patriots used for their success? Not that we're worthy of being compared to the Pats yet, but it seems like Mularkey might be using a similar formula (possibly the only one that will work in the age of salary cap parity).
4. What's with all the confidence in Shaud Williams as our back-up? He showed some promise last year, but keep in mind it was in garbage time against teams with bad D's. Plus he lacks McGahee's size and power, so if he has to come in it will change the way the O-line has to set up.
1. The Bills went to a record four straight Super Bowls in the early 1990's. The so-called "dynasty" of the New England Patriots are only halfway there (although they accomplished something the Bills didn't by winning the SB, they're still a long way from the record).
2. I was watching the 2004 Bills highlights on NFL network. The Bills are in an odd position. Clearly, at the end of last season we showed we are significantly better than middle-of-the-pack teams like Cincinnatti, Seattle and St. Louis. Yet, we still can't beat first tier teams like Pittsburgh and NE. What needs to be done to take the next step?
3. Also in '04, there were numerous "no names" who contributed to our success. Euhus, Peters, and Freddy Smith come immediately to mind. Others did it in less obvious fashion: Stamer, Rashad Baker, etc. Is this the same path that the Patriots used for their success? Not that we're worthy of being compared to the Pats yet, but it seems like Mularkey might be using a similar formula (possibly the only one that will work in the age of salary cap parity).
4. What's with all the confidence in Shaud Williams as our back-up? He showed some promise last year, but keep in mind it was in garbage time against teams with bad D's. Plus he lacks McGahee's size and power, so if he has to come in it will change the way the O-line has to set up.
Comment